The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.scheme
From: Feuer <fe...@his.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 14:09:09 -0400
Local: Sat, Sep 21 2002 2:09 pm
Subject: Re: LISP - CommonLisp / Scheme - Differences
ilias wrote: You are an idiot. Common Lisp is only one of a number of Lisps, > i've read them. > scheme makes no sense. > all lisp-dialects => common lisp. > scheme not. > scheme = the most stubborn lispers. > at least it looks so. > anyway. though more popular than most. Scheme may or may not be a Lisp (it is a call-by-value impure untyped/unitype functional language with s-expression syntax, macro systems, a special top-level environment, and letrec), but it derives directly from Lisp, was invented in large part by the creator of Common Lisp, and is generally considered a Lisp. David You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||