ANN: Mosh 0.0.6 released - A Fast R6RS Scheme interpreter
higepon
http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/
About This Release
------------------
Improved load speed of "R6RS batch mode" using psyntax.
Run with -b option like "cd r6rs-examples; mosh -b hello.ss"
There are some samples in mosh/r6rs-examples directory.
Supported running "R6RS test suite".
R6RS test suite written by PLT Scheme project.
http://svn.plt-scheme.org/plt/trunk/collects/tests/r6rs/
Run like following.
mosh -b tests/r6rs/run/mutable-strings.sps
Mosh 0.0.6 passed following tests.
mutable-strings, mutable-pairs,
contrib, programs, control, hashtables,
records/procedural, lists and enums.
Implemented R6RS Hashtables.
Implemented R6RS Records.
Implemented R6RS Exceptions and conditions.
Implemented R6RS List Utilities.
Implemented R6RS Enumerations.
Implemented dynamic-wind.
Improved internal error system.
Fixed bug of call/cc with multiple values.
Applied READ_CHAR/grass.scm patch by IRIE Shinsuke.
Added many procedures.
Fixed many bugs.
Please send your comments on Mosh at:
http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/issues/list
---
Taro Minowa(Higepon)
http://www.monaos.org/
http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/
http://www.facebook.com/people/Taro_Minowa_Higepon/649065487
namekuseijin
> Mosh is A Fast R6RS Scheme interpreter written in C++.http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/
> ---
> Taro Minowa(Higepon)
>
> http://www.monaos.org/http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/http://www.facebook.com/people/Taro_Minowa_Higepon/649065487
Nice, man. Good to know Japan isn't only about Ruby. :)
Nice projects as well.
Good to see R6RS getting traction...
I hope SRFI-97 gets supported soon so we can began referencing SRFIs
in a R6RS-compatible portable way.
higepon
I will check srfi-97 later.
On 8月29日, 午前5:06, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 12:43 am, higepon <hige...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mosh is A Fast R6RS Scheme interpreter written in C++.http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/
> > Please send your comments on Mosh at:http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/issues/list
> > ---
> > Taro Minowa(Higepon)
>
> >http://www.monaos.org/http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/http://www...
Slobodan Blazeski
Congratulations.
May I ask how do you implemented the continuations , copying the
stack, cps conversion or something else. Little bit lazy too dig
through source code.
bobi
higepon
> May I ask how do you implemented the continuations
We copy the VM stack for the continuation.
I learned how to implement the continuation from following article by
Kent Dyvbig.
It kindly teach me how to implment Scheme VM also.
http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~dyb/papers/3imp.pdf
Slobodan Blazeski
higepon wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > May I ask how do you implemented the continuations
>
> We copy the VM stack for the continuation.
That's exactly what I want to avoid, but the only solution seems to be
having a compiler.
> I learned how to implement the continuation from following article by
> Kent Dyvbig.
> It kindly teach me how to implment Scheme VM also.
Thank you very much for the link.
cheers
Bobi
Abdulaziz Ghuloum
>>>
>> We copy the VM stack for the continuation.
>>
> That's exactly what I want to avoid, but the only solution
> seems to be having a compiler.
How does having a compiler change anything? You can implement
any continuation strategy (explicit heap allocation of frames,
eager copying of the stack, copy-on-write, etc.) regardless of
the implementation strategy for the rest of the system (e.g.,
interpreted, compiled to C, compiled to machine code, CPSed,
SSAed, or not). It is completely orthogonal.
Aziz,,,