<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.lang.scheme Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme</link>
  <description>The Scheme Programming language.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Online job, Get payout whenever you want.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/4716c469aae22d81/31bf59c618afdb3e?show_docid=31bf59c618afdb3e</link>
  <description>
  Online Income Opportunity, Make money by doing simple Computer work &lt;br&gt; for 1hour daily and get about rs 50 to rs 500 daily.. No experience &lt;br&gt; required. Basic knowledge of Computer and Internet is enough. Suitable &lt;br&gt; for housewives, students, workers, retired persons and youths... Get &lt;br&gt; your payout daily through bank transfer. We 100% grantee for your
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/4716c469aae22d81</guid>
  <author>
  saidape...@gmail.com
  (prince)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:35:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Lisp in Small Pieces vs state of the art</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/a94ce2a8ae1ccc23/0a1b9a868b96c4ac?show_docid=0a1b9a868b96c4ac</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve recently read Christian Queinnec&#39;s Lisp in Small Pieces. I didn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; study it thoroughly enough to understand every little bit, still it was &lt;br&gt; a fascinating and instructional read. What I&#39;m wondering about now is &lt;br&gt; this: the book&#39;s contents are around 12 to 15 years old and research on &lt;br&gt; implementing Lisp-like languages has not stagnated in the meantime.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/a94ce2a8ae1ccc23</guid>
  <author>
  mich...@schuerig.de
  (Michael Schuerig)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:22:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Vancouver Lisp Users Group meeting for September 2008 - The BKNR Common Lisp web application development environment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/e6216e30ad680aac/714753c638e5c0cf?show_docid=714753c638e5c0cf</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; We&#39;ve had a few presentations on web application development &lt;br&gt; environments/frameworks at lispvan. For our September lispvan meeting, &lt;br&gt; Hans Hübner will be flying over from Berlin (actually, he&#39;s coming for &lt;br&gt; the ICFP conference in Victoria, but has graciously agreed to come &lt;br&gt; over to Vancouver for the evening while he&#39;s in the area) to give us a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/e6216e30ad680aac</guid>
  <author>
  billc...@gmail.com
  (billc)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:40:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>parser generators for scheme</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/274d4b7465259084/ebcb22566f715163?show_docid=ebcb22566f715163</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I currently working on a compiler/interpreter type system in scheme &lt;br&gt; and I was if there are any good parser generation tools for scheme &lt;br&gt; which include the ability to track the character position of tokens in &lt;br&gt; the parse stream for both error reporting during semantic analysis and &lt;br&gt; runtime. &lt;br&gt; The only tool I have found so far is lalr-scm where I am not sure if
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/274d4b7465259084</guid>
  <author>
  carterch...@gmail.com
  (cartercheng@gmail.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:20:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>ICFP09 Announcement</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/875d5a2f0dcd4ea6/f1f56692787633b1?show_docid=f1f56692787633b1</link>
  <description>
  +----------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------+ &lt;br&gt; ANNOUNCEMENT &lt;br&gt; The 14th ACM SIGPLAN International &lt;br&gt; Conference on Functional Programming &lt;br&gt; ICFP 2009 &lt;br&gt; 31st August - 2nd September 2009
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/875d5a2f0dcd4ea6</guid>
  <author>
  icfp.public...@googlemail.com
  (Matthew Fluet (ICFP Publicity Chair))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:09:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>the jargon lisp1 vs lisp2 [was: function aliasing]</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/37f1232325cfe232/176003e9fd9bee35?show_docid=176003e9fd9bee35</link>
  <description>
  I have in the past wrote a article on the harm of the jargon lisp 1 &lt;br&gt; and lisp 2. &lt;br&gt; For the general readers in lisp groups, please see: &lt;br&gt; Why You should Not Use The Jargon Lisp1 and Lisp2 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://xahlee.org/emacs/lisp1_vs_lisp2.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Plain text version follows: &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ -------- &lt;br&gt; Why You should Not Use The Jargon Lisp1 and Lisp2
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/37f1232325cfe232</guid>
  <author>
  xah...@gmail.com
  (xahlee@gmail.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:13:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Anyone wanting to take over PS/Tk?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/88fe298ffd943dca/4b840d0b81b41231?show_docid=4b840d0b81b41231</link>
  <description>
  Is anybody out there interested in continuing the development &lt;br&gt; of PS/Tk, the Portable Scheme/Tk interface? &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.t3x.org/pstk/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; All code is on the above page (pstk.scm). An obsolete and &lt;br&gt; utterly incompatible version can be found at the Snowfort &lt;br&gt; (see link on the above page). &lt;br&gt; I will stop maintaining this project with immediate effect
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/88fe298ffd943dca</guid>
  <author>
  news2...@t3x.org
  (Nils M Holm)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 06:03:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Determining Scheme Implementation</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/d2778529ee6f9e9f/bab4168f018a7ab5?show_docid=bab4168f018a7ab5</link>
  <description>
  I want to try to make a cross-implementation library that I can use &lt;br&gt; for some system-related tasks (starting a program, communicating to it &lt;br&gt; via unix stdin, etc). Most of the implementations I am interested in &lt;br&gt; offer this sort of functionality, but the mechanisms differ. Is there &lt;br&gt; any way that I could easily determine the Scheme implementation that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/d2778529ee6f9e9f</guid>
  <author>
  will.donne...@gmail.com
  (Will Donnelly)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:45:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>ONLINE RESOURCE FOR HELP DESK SOFTWARE</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/004874cb7647239e/7b2e059548da9493?show_docid=7b2e059548da9493</link>
  <description>
  ONLINE RESOURCE FOR HELP DESK SOFTWARE &lt;br&gt; ________________ &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://helpdesksoftwaremanagement.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/004874cb7647239e</guid>
  <author>
  nancygro...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:51:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Compiler Internals</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/17db7e496ff60303/3d3e7173df609b8f?show_docid=3d3e7173df609b8f</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; What would be considered a good choice for the intermediate representation &lt;br&gt; in a scheme compiler these days? So far I&#39;ve found CPS, ANF, and SSA &lt;br&gt; with them being translatable between each other, with exceptions. I &lt;br&gt; understand SSA and CPS the best and am just looking into ANF. &lt;br&gt; There were a great crop of theises and papers around the mid 90&#39;s about
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/17db7e496ff60303</guid>
  <author>
  psil...@merlin.cs.wisc.edu
  (Peter Keller)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:39:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>The Scheme Programming language.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/558b95b7c11dacbc/f82d70aedd4bd33a?show_docid=f82d70aedd4bd33a</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.richworld8.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/558b95b7c11dacbc</guid>
  <author>
  ramyap...@gmail.com
  (Esther)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:25:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>ANN: Mosh 0.0.6 released - A Fast R6RS Scheme interpreter</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/58363092be8f96d0/42ad6bde8fb72148?show_docid=42ad6bde8fb72148</link>
  <description>
  Mosh is A Fast R6RS Scheme interpreter written in C++. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/mosh-scheme/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; About This Release &lt;br&gt; ------------------ &lt;br&gt; Improved load speed of &amp;quot;R6RS batch mode&amp;quot; using psyntax. &lt;br&gt; Run with -b option like &amp;quot;cd r6rs-examples; mosh -b hello.ss&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; There are some samples in mosh/r6rs-examples directory.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/58363092be8f96d0</guid>
  <author>
  hige...@gmail.com
  (higepon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:43:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Combine let* let letrec into super-let (or simply let)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/42b3096f8f4dd070/6f8a2d3f61a38dcf?show_docid=6f8a2d3f61a38dcf</link>
  <description>
  hi &lt;br&gt; Please combine let* let letrec into super-let, (or simply let) for &lt;br&gt; future consideration. &lt;br&gt; I can not for my life see a reason for keeping &amp;quot;the other&amp;quot; &amp;quot;lets&amp;quot;, &lt;br&gt; other than the super-let (or simply let). Is there occassions why one &lt;br&gt; would want &amp;quot;the other&amp;quot; &amp;quot;lets&amp;quot; other than super-let? If one word can &lt;br&gt; mean three features, why not use the super version for brevity. Just a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/42b3096f8f4dd070</guid>
  <author>
  narutocan...@gmail.com
  (narutocanada@gmail.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:19:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>introspection in Scheme?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/efdcdd2aad244c77/d1b8d4037ca019a0?show_docid=d1b8d4037ca019a0</link>
  <description>
  Is there any nice way to perform procedure introspection in Scheme? &lt;br&gt; That is, I&#39;d like to be able to inspect, at runtime, the internal &lt;br&gt; structure of a procedure; what arguments does it take and what does &lt;br&gt; the procedure body look like? &lt;br&gt; PLT Scheme seems to have procedure-arity so perhaps there&#39;s some hope
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/efdcdd2aad244c77</guid>
  <author>
  nap...@gmail.com
  (Nyang A. Phra)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:55:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Best scheme for embedding in C?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/3dbb3e47058e656a/eee8d3a694629ada?show_docid=eee8d3a694629ada</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; which would be the best scheme implementation for embedding in a C &lt;br&gt; program. I think what I need is a scheme that is provided as a library &lt;br&gt; that I can link with the rest of my app. But main() will be in the C &lt;br&gt; application, not in the scheme library. I would want to be able to &lt;br&gt; create scheme functions callable from the C application. I would also
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/3dbb3e47058e656a</guid>
  <author>
  neil.bay...@gmail.com
  (Neil Baylis)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:39:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
