Actually we have:
- DISLIN binding (Förster vom Silberwald: wholly completed)
- gsl (Will, PhD student from MIT is working in his spare time on a gsl
binding to Bigloo)
- here I would appreciate: a binding to R language (only the core
functionality) or to any statistics package. gsl has some basic
statistics functions but not as many as R.
The other day I was forced to use R. It has a lot of usefull functions
but nobody can tell me that its buil-in programming language has any
virtue. Surely, they write that R is based on some Scheme but they do
not tell why they crippled R and made them without paranetheses.
I once thought adapting X-Lisp to Bigloo would be valuable.
Regards,
Siegfried Gonzi
PS: There exists actually two bindings to R in Python. As I see it:
they used some tricks to circumvent to have to deal with R objects
because realizing types in Python are not that easy.
I wonder whatever happened to a plt library for simulation?
Cheers,
Henry
You are probably thinking of the impressice PLT Scheme
Science Collection.
<http://planet.plt-scheme.org/#science.plt>
There is a draft of the documentation at:
<http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/Tmp/science.pdf>
--
Jens Axel Søgaard
At the moment I'm casting about for a real scheme to use as a base for
statistical work. My shopping list consists of
cross-platform portability (including gui), reasonable efficiency, good
FFI, unicode support, preemptive threads, Clos-like object system. Given
a reasonable subset of this list, I'll be happy to work at bringing as
much functionality from R to scheme as I can. The trick will be to get
other statisticians to chip in.