Leslie Lamport is a Jew - His book is NOTORIOUSLY uninsightful and obfuscatory
small Pox
uninsightful&obfuscatory (nothing on the design of LaTeX and macros,
no insights)
but he made millions from his book as you can tell from the number of
copies sold, ie even if he got a dollar from a copy, he made millions.
Stephen Wolfram is also a jew. I wonder how his Univ of Phd studies
let him get away with the copyright to the work he did as a Phd
student.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/23/jack-abramoff-lobbyist-scandal-pizza
The secret of jew success :: promote each other by hook or crook :::
giving a fellow Jew a fresh start was part of what Judaism stood for.
"We're all Jews, we're all on the same team."
Abramoff, an Orthodox Jew, gave shirum – Torah lectures – to Jewish
inmates on an almost daily basis.
Disgraced US lobbyist Jack Abramoff gets fresh start in pizza
restaurant
After serving time for peddling influence in Washington, Abramoff
finds work at Tov Pizza in Baltimore
* Mark Tran
* guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 23 June 2010 18.00 BST
Disgraced Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff has found work in a
Baltimore pizza restaurant Disgraced Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff
has found work in a Baltimore pizza restaurant after his release from
jail. Photograph: Carlos Barria/Reuters
Once a high-powered Washington lobbyist who hobnobbed with George Bush
and other top Republicans, Jack Abramoff is now working at a kosher
pizza restaurant in Baltimore, Maryland, it emerged today.
Abramoff started working at Tov Pizza on Monday after his release this
month from prison in Maryland, where he had served a three-and-a-half
year sentence for fraud, corruption and conspiracy.
The owner of Tov Pizza, Ron Rosenbluth, told the Baltimore Jewish
Times that giving a fellow Jew a fresh start was part of what Judaism
stood for. He was happy that Tov Pizza could provide Abramoff with
that new beginning: "We're all Jews, we're all on the same team."
Abramoff reported to a halfway house run by a non-profit organisation,
which arranged the job. The restaurant owner has hired halfway house
residents before.
According to one of his former fellow inmates, Abramoff, an Orthodox
Jew, gave shirum – Torah lectures – to Jewish inmates on an almost
daily basis.
He is not a complete stranger to the business as he once owned a
kosher restaurant in Washington.
The Abramoff lobbying scandal helped the Democratic party regain
Congress as Republicans were hit by accusations of sleaze. Abramoff
pleaded guilty in January 2006 to fraud, tax evasion and conspiracy to
bribe public officials by showering them with gifts.
Abramoff had a direct pipeline to the Bush White House and influenced
several key decisions, according to a bipartisan congressional report
released in 2008.
The report uncovered six one-on-one encounters between Abramoff and
former president George Bush – four more than the White House
acknowledged in its denials of any significant ties to the lobbyist.
Richard
Will you please shut the hell up.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
<http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>
Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
David Kastrup
> Leslie Lamport is a Jew - His book is NOTORIOUSLY
> uninsightful&obfuscatory (nothing on the design of LaTeX and macros,
> no insights)
> but he made millions from his book as you can tell from the number of
> copies sold, ie even if he got a dollar from a copy, he made millions.
>
> Stephen Wolfram is also a jew. I wonder how his Univ of Phd studies
> let him get away with the copyright to the work he did as a Phd
> student.
With this posting you highlight two obviously highly intelligent people
whom you identify as jews (I have no idea whether this would be
accurate, but that's not really relevant) and one hate-mongering bigoted
complete moron (namely yourself) who you implicitly identify as a
non-jew.
It appears to me that you are doing a spectacularly bad job at whatever
point you are trying to make.
--
David Kastrup
UKTUG FAQ: <URL:http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html>
Christian Stapfer
news:87eifw5...@lola.goethe.zz...
Not necessarily: As Nietzsche observed, there is hardly a more malicious
way of undermining a position that one is actually opposed to than
to defend it with SILLY arguments.
Since we do not know what the OP wanted to achieve with his post,
we are unable to decide whether he did achieve his goal or not.
nanothermite911fbibustards
The following table of contents is not untypical.
The jew tortured me for 2 hrs playing loud guitar while I needed rest.
Table of Contents:
1. Einstein Discovers His Racist Calling
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The Manufacture and Sale of St. Einstein
1.2.1 Promoting the "Cult" of Einstein
1.2.2 The "Jewish Press" Sanctifies a Fellow Jew
1.3 In a Racist Era
2. The Destructive Impact of Racist Jewish Tribalism
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Do Not Blaspheme the "Jewish Saint"
2.3 Harvard University Asks a Forbidden Question
2.4 Americans React to the Invasion of Eastern European Jews
2.4.1 Jewish Disloyalty
2.4.2 In Answer to the "Jewish Question"
3. Rothschild, Rex Ivdaeorvm
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Jewish Messianic Supremacism
3.3 The "Eastern Question" and the World Wars
3.3.1 Donmeh Crypto-Jews, The Turkish Empire and Palestine
3.3.2 The World Wars—A Jewish Antidote to Jewish
Assimilation
3.4 Rothschild Warmongering
3.4.1 Inter-Jewish Racism
3.4.1.1 Rothschild Power and Influence Leads to
Unbearable Jewish Arrogance
3.4.1.2 Jewish Intolerance and Mass Murder of
Gentiles
3.4.2 The Messiah Myth
3.5 Jewish Dogmatism and Control of the Press Stifles Debate
3.5.1 Advertising Einstein in the English Speaking World
3.5.2 Reaction to the Unprecedented Einstein Promotion
3.5.3 The Berlin Philharmonic—The Response in Germany
3.5.4 Jewish Hypocrisy and Double Standards
3.6 The Messiah Rothschilds' War on the Gentiles—and the Jews
4. Einstein the Racist Coward
4.1 Introduction
4.2 The Power of Jewish Tribalism Inhibits the Progress of
Science and Deliberately Promotes "Racial" Discord
4.3 A Jew is Not Allowed to Speak Out Against a Jew
4.4 The Bad Nauheim Debate
4.4.1 Einstein Desires a "Race" War Which Will Exterminate
the European Esau
4.4.2 Genocidal Judaism—Pruning the Branches of the Human
Family Tree
4.4.3 Crypto-Jews
4.4.4 The Gentiles Must be Exterminated Lest God Cut Off
the Jews
4.4.5 Jewish Dualism and Human Sacrifice—Evil is Good
4.4.6 Gentiles are Destined to Slave for the Jews, Then
the Slaves Will be Exterminated
4.4.7 Lenard Sickens of Einstein's Libels
4.4.8 Let the Debate Begin
4.4.8.1 Einstein Disappoints—"Albertus Maximus" is a
Laughingstock
4.4.8.2 Contemporary Accounts of the Bad Nauheim
Debate
4.5 Einstein the Genocidal Racist
4.6 Racist Jewish Hypocrisy, Intimidation and Censorship
4.7 Einstein's Trip to America
4.7.1 Einstein Faces Criticism in America
4.7.1.1 Einstein Hides from Reuterdahl's Challenge
to Debate
4.7.1.2 Cowardly Einstein Caught in a Lie
4.7.1.3 Reuterdahl Pursues Einstein, Who Continues
to Run
4.7.2 Einstein All Hype
4.8 Assassination Plots
4.9 Wolff Crying, Dirty Tricks, Censorship, Smear Campaigns and
Anonymous Threats in the Name of Einstein
5. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
5.1 Introduction
5.2 The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
5.3 Did Anyone Believe that the Protocols were Genuine?
5.3.1 Human Sacrifice and the Plan to Discredit Gentile
Government—Fulfilled
5.3.2 The World Awakens to the "Jewish Peril"
5.3.3 America Becomes the "New Jerusalem"
5.3.4 "The Jewish Peril"
5.3.5 The Inhumanity of the Bolsheviks
5.4 International Zionist and Communist Intimidation
5.4.1 Suppression of Free Speech
5.4.2 Jewish Terrorism
5.5 Attempts to Prove the Protocols Inauthentic
5.5.1 Why Did Henry Ford Criticize the Jews?
5.5.2 Controlled Opposition and "The Trust"
5.5.3 The Sinking of the "Peace Ship"
5.5.4 Ford Comes Under Attack—The War Against Pacificism
5.5.5 Zionists Proscribe Free Speech
5.5.6 President Woodrow Wilson Becomes a Zionist Dictator
5.6 Why Did the Zionists Trouble the Jews?
5.6.1 The Zionist Myth of the Extinction of the "Jewish
Race" Through Philo-Semitism and Assimilation
5.6.2 The Zionists Set the Stage for the Second World
War. . . and the Third
5.7 Henry Ford for President
5.8 The "Jewish Mission"
5.9 Jewish Bankers Destroy Russia and Finance Adolf Hitler
5.10 The Holocaust as a Zionist Eugenics Program for the Jewish
"Remnant": Zionist Nazis Use Natural and Artificial Selection to
Strengthen the Genetic Stock of Jews Destined for Forced Deportation
to Palestine
5.11 Zionist Lies
5.12 Zionists Declare that Anti-Semitism is the Salvation of the
"Jewish Race"
5.13 Communist Jews in America
5.14 The Attempted Assassination of Henry Ford
5.15 How the Zionists Blackmailed President Wilson
5.15.1 Before the War, the Zionists Plan a Peace
Conference After the War—to be Led by a Zionist Like Woodrow Wilson
5.15.2 "Colonel" Edward Mandell House
5.15.3 The Balfour Declaration—QUID PRO QUO
5.16 A Newspaper History of Zionist Intrigues During the First
World War, which Proves that Jewish Bankers Betrayed Germany
5.17 The Germans' Side of the First World War
6. Zionism is Racism
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Political Zionism is a Form of Racism
6.3 Most Jews Opposed Zionism
6.4 The Brotherhood of Anti-Semites and Zionists
6.5 Albert Einstein Becomes a Cheerleader for Racist Zionism
6.5.1 While Zionists and Sycophants Hailed Einstein, Most
Scientists Rejected Him and "His" Theories
6.5.2 Hypocritical and Cowardly Einstein Plays the "Race
Card" and Cripples Scientific Progress
6.5.3 What is Good for Goose is not Good for the Goyim
6.5.3.1 Supremacist and Segregationist Jewish "Neo-
Messianism"
6.5.3.2 It is Alright for Jews to Claim that
"Einstein's Theories" are "Jewish", but Goyim Dare Not Say It
7. Nazism is Zionism
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Blut und Boden—A Jewish Ideal
7.3 Zionism is Built on Lies and Hatred
7.4 The Hypocritical Vilification of Caligula—Ancient Jewish
Historians are not Credible
7.5 All the Best Zionists are Anti-Semites
7.5.1 Nazism is a Stalking Horse for Zionism and Communism
7.5.2 Hitler and Goebbels Reveal Their True Motives at
War's End
7.5.3 Zionists and Communists Delight in Massive Human
Sacrifices to the Jewish Messianic Cause
7.5.4 Einstein Lulls Jews into Complacency—The Zionist
Trap
7.5.4.1 Depressions Make for Fertile Ground for Anti-
Semitic Zionist Dictators
7.5.4.2 Einstein a Subtle Hitler Apologist
7.5.5 Einstein's Seething Racist Hatred and Rabid
Nationalism
7.5.6 The Final Solution of the Jewish Question is
Zionism, but the Final Solution of the German Question is
Extermination
7.6 The Carrot and the Stick
7.7 British Zionists, in Collaboration with Nazi Zionists, in
Collaboration with Palestinian Zionists, Ensured that the Jews of
Continental Europe Would Find No Sanctuary Before the War Ended
7.8 Documented Collaboration Between the Palestinian Zionists
and the Zionist Nazis
8. How the Jews Made the British into Zionists
8.1 Introduction
8.2 The Rothschilds and Disraeli Lead the British Down the
Garden Path to Palestine
8.3 Jews Provoke Perpetual War
8.4 Jewish World Government—A Prophetic Desire
8.5 Puritans and Protestants Serve Jewish Interests
8.6 The Planned Apocalypse
8.7 Cabalistic Jews Calling Themselves Christian Condition the
British to Assist in Their Own Demise—Rothschild Makes an Open Bid to
Become the Messiah
8.7.1 The "British-Israel" Deceit
8.7.2 For Centuries, England is Flooded with Warmongering
Zionist Propaganda
8.7.3 As a Good Cabalist Jew, David Hartley Conditions
Christians to Welcome Martyrdom for the Sake of the Jews
8.7.3.1 Jewish Revolutionaries and Napoleon the
Messiah Emancipate the Jews
8.7.3.2 Hitler Accomplishes for the Zionists What
Napoleon Could Not
8.7.3.3 Zionists Develop a Strategy Which Culminates
in the Nazis and the Holocaust as Means to Attain the "Jewish State"
9. The Priority Myth
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Opinions of Einstein and "His" Work
9.3 The Aether
9.4 The So-Called "Lorentz Transformation"
9.4.1 Woldemar Voigt's Space-Time Transformation
9.4.2 Length Contraction
9.4.2.1 Dynamic Length Contraction
9.4.2.2 Kinematic Length Contraction
9.4.3 Time Dilatation
9.4.4 The Final Form of the Transformation
9.4.5 Einstein's Fudge
9.4.6 Einstein Begged the Question
9.5 The "Two Postulates"
9.5.1 The "Principle of Relativity"
9.5.2 The "Light Postulate"
9.6 Relative Simultaneity
9.6.1 Isotropic Light Speed
9.6.2 The "Aarau Question"
9.6.3 Light Signals and Clock Synchronization
9.7 Conclusion
10. "Space-Time" or is it "Time-Space"?
10.1 Introduction
10.2 The Ancients and "Space-Time"
10.3 Einstein and "Space-Time"
11. Hilbert's Proofs Prove Hilbert's Priority
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Corry, Renn and Stachel's Baseless Historical Revisionism
11.3 Historical Background and the Correspondence
11.4 Hilbert's Proofs Prove Hilbert's Priority
11.5 A Question of Character
11.6 A Question of Ability
11.7 Conclusion
12. Gerber's Formula
12.1 Introduction
12.2 How Fast Does Gravity Go?
12.3 Gerber's Formula was Well-Known
12.4 Einstein's Fudge
12.5 Who Was Paul Gerber?
12.6 Conclusion
13. Soldner's Prediction
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Soldner's Hypothesis and Solution
13.3 Einstein Knew the Newtonian Prediction
13.4 Soldner's Formulation
13.5 Conclusion
14. The Principle of Equivalence, Etc.
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Eotvos' Experimental Fact and Planck's Proposition
14.3 Kinertia's Elevator is Einstein's Happiest Thought
14.4 Dynamism
14.5 Mach's Principle
14.6 The Rubber Sheet Analogy
14.7 Reference Frames and Covariance
14.8 Conclusion
15. "Theory of Relativity" or "Pseudorelativism"?
15.1 Introduction
15.2 The "Theory of Relativity" is an Absolutist Theory
16. E = MC 2
16.1 Introduction
16.2 The "Quantity of Motion"—Momentum, Vis Viva and Kinetic
Energy
16.3 The Atom as a Source of Energy and Explosive Force
16.4 The Inertia of Energy
16.5 The Einsteins' Energy Fudge
16.6 Hero Worship
16.7 Conclusion
17. Einstein's Modus Operandi
17.1 Introduction
17.2 "Mach's" Principle of Logical Economy
17.3 Einstein's Fallacies of Petitio Principii
17.4 Conclusion
18. Mileva Einstein-Marity
18.1 Introduction
18.2 Witness Accounts and the Evidence
18.3 Prophets of the Prize
18.4 Conclusion
19. Albert Einstein's Nobel Prize
19.1 Introduction
19.2 The Nobel Foundation Directorate Learns that Einstein is a
Plagiarist
19.3 "The Thomson-Einstein Theory" Makes a Convenient Excuse
19.4 The Origins of the Law of the Photo-Electric Effect
19.5 Einstein's Nobel Prize was Undeserved
19.6 Einstein Breaks the Rules
19.7 Conclusion
The FAT per DIEM FBI bustards use our TAX PAYER MONEY and INCOMPETENCE
is UNACCEPTABLE.
=====
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX18zUp6WPY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQapkVCx1HI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXJ-k-iOg0M
Hey Racist and INcompetent FBI Bustards, where is the ANTHRAX Mailer ?
Where are the 4 blackboxes ? Where are the Pentagon Videos ? Why did
you release the 5 dancing Israelis compromising the whole 911
investigation ? If the Dubai Police can catch Mossad Murderers and put
the videos and Iranian Police can why cant you put the Pentagon
Videos ? If Iran police can put the AMERICAN TERRORIST, Riggi and
puting on INTERNATIONAL MEDIA a day after catching him without
TORTURE, why cant you put the INNOCENT patsies on the MEDIA. Why did
you have to LIE about Dr Afiya Siddiqui and torture that Innocent
little mother of 3 and smashing the skull of her one child ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhMcii8smxk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SZ2lxDJmdg
There are CRIMINAL cases against CIA CRIMINAL Bustards in Italian
courts.
FBI bustards paid a penalty of $5.8 million to Steven Hatfill, but
only because he was a white. They got away with MURDER of thousands of
Non-whites in all parts of the world.
Daily 911 news : http://911blogger.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRfhUezbKLw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7kGZ3XPEm4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lX18zUp6WPY
Conclusion : FBI bustards are RACIST and INcompetent. They could
neither catch the ANTHRAX or 911 YANK/Jew criminals nor could they
cover them up - whichever was their actual goal or task.
SLASH the SALARIES of FBI/CIA/NSA etc BUSTARDS into half all across
tbe board, esp the whites/jew on the top.
FBI Bustards failed to Catch BERNARD MADOFF even after that RACIST and
UNPATRIOTIC Act
FBI bustards failed to prevent ROMAN POLANSKY from absconding to
europe and rapes.
FBI bustards failed to prevent OKLAHOMA
nanothermite911fbibustards
> "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> schrieb im Newsbeitragnews:87eifw5...@lola.goethe.zz...
>
>
>
Can one of REGULAR SYCOPHANTs of STEPHEN WOLFRAM tell me where is the
section of references in WOLFRAM's 1988 book on mathematica ?
Does he steal any idea from LISP ?
What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
Is it ETHICAL to use a SEMINAL IDEA from someone and not GIVE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ?
Christian Stapfer
"nanothermite911fbibustards" <nanothermite9...@gmail.com> schrieb
im Newsbeitrag
news:a2d56454-8d61-4cff...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
It starts on page xvi, titled "Background and Acknowledgements".
>
> Does he steal any idea from LISP ?
Of course he does. In science and technology everybody "steals"
a great deal from others. Or, as Newton famously put it, they
are all "standing on the shoulders of giants".
Science and technology are collective endeavors: never mind
the capitalist ideology that is put on top of it, like tinsel on
a Christmas tree.
For example, when John McCarthy in 1958 developed LISP, he
"stole" from Church (lambda calculus), and Church, in turn,
had "stolen" from other mathematicians, who in turn had
"stolen" from ...
Maybe you want to read "The Crime of Reason" (Robert B.
Laughlin) now...
When Wolfram wrote his 1988 book, the ideas of LISP were so much
part of the basics for anyone who was developing a new programming
language, that there really was not much need for him to belabor
that fact for pages and pages (see for example, P.J. Landin: "The
next 700 programming languages", published as early as 1966).
> What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
>
> Is it ETHICAL to use a SEMINAL IDEA from someone and not GIVE
> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ?
Many scientists are using theories they don't feel required
to give credit for to anyone. - Why? - Because those to whom
they might have given credit are so well known by all who
are in the know that is not really necessary to even mention
them - although, of course, one might want mention them
anyway (as to the ignoramuses: those names would be
without any deeper meaning to them).
David Kastrup
> "nanothermite911fbibustards" <nanothermite9...@gmail.com>
> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:a2d56454-8d61-4cff...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
>> Can one of REGULAR SYCOPHANTs of STEPHEN WOLFRAM tell me where is the
>> section of references in WOLFRAM's 1988 book on mathematica ?
>
> It starts on page xvi, titled "Background and Acknowledgements".
>
>> Does he steal any idea from LISP ?
[...]
>> What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
>>
>> Is it ETHICAL to use a SEMINAL IDEA from someone and not GIVE
>> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ?
>
> Many scientists are using theories they don't feel required
> to give credit for to anyone. - Why? - Because those to whom
> they might have given credit are so well known by all who
> are in the know that is not really necessary to even mention
> them - although, of course, one might want mention them
> anyway (as to the ignoramuses: those names would be
> without any deeper meaning to them).
Well, the original poster also did not give credit to "Mein Kampf" and
its preceding works reaching right back into Middle Ages and beyond.
It's not like he is the inventor of antisemitism and his particular
conspiracy theories, and yet he does not give his references, either.
nanothermite911fbibustards
> "nanothermite911fbibustards" <nanothermite911fbibusta...@gmail.com> schrieb
> im Newsbeitragnews:a2d56454-8d61-4cff...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
You can use the idea, but you have to give the source. It is not clear
for many new comers and students. Wolfram Inc marketed the book in 80
vigorously to the industry.
The book has no BNF grammar description. Its an intellectual crime
perpetrated on the students. The way he approaches is not by concepts
which would entail explaining the fact this it was immitated and
regurgitated from LISP as well as the Meta CIRCULAR interpreter. Paul
Graham is in contrast commendable and Intellectually honest.
> For example, when John McCarthy in 1958 developed LISP, he
> "stole" from Church (lambda calculus), and Church, in turn,
> had "stolen" from other mathematicians, who in turn had
> "stolen" from ...
No, McCarthy does not steal. The very fact that he uses the word
LAMBDA and gives reference to the origins. Wolfram's 1988 book does
not say that its a transmogrification of LISP and that he got the
interpreter most definitely by reading one of his papers.
What about the copyright being assigned to his graduate school ? Did
he use any university computer to do the thesis and university
professor as his advisor ?
> Maybe you want to read "The Crime of Reason" (Robert B.
> Laughlin) now...
>
> When Wolfram wrote his 1988 book, the ideas of LISP were so much
> part of the basics for anyone who was developing a new programming
> language, that there really was not much need for him to belabor
> that fact for pages and pages (see for example, P.J. Landin: "The
> next 700 programming languages", published as early as 1966).
All he had to do was put one line that the basic model is from LISP
and give a reference to the metacircular interpreter paper or explain
a minimal one like Paul Graham does.
> > What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
Hey Sycophant, What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
Hey Sycophant, What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
> > Is it ETHICAL to use a SEMINAL IDEA from someone and not GIVE
> > ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ?
It is not about FEELING. Its about PRACTICE. Its about ETHICS !!! The
coming generations need this when they read and study.
> Many scientists are using theories they don't feel required
> to give credit for to anyone. - Why? - Because those to whom
> they might have given credit are so well known by all who
> are in the know that is not really necessary to even mention
> them - although, of course, one might want mention them
> anyway (as to the ignoramuses: those names would be
> without any deeper meaning to them).
Hey Sycophant, What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
nanothermite911fbibustards
> "Christian Stapfer" <nob...@nowhere.nil> writes:
> > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> >news:a2d56454-8d61-4cff...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> Can one of REGULAR SYCOPHANTs of STEPHEN WOLFRAM tell me where is the
> >> section of references in WOLFRAM's 1988 book on mathematica ?
>
> > It starts on page xvi, titled "Background and Acknowledgements".
That is HOG WASH. He puts so many languages, TO CONFUSE where the
ESSENTIAL IDEA comes from. Its RIGHT FROM LISP. That META-RECURSIVE
interpreter is short and INTENSE concentration can be focussed on it
to make sure of its CORRECTNESS. There is no other way such a program
could be ERECTED. He also gives no contribution to each math source.
For example, Cleve Moler's company, the one that produces MATLAB,
gives sources in its manuals to where they got each idea in their tool
box. Key paper references are given.
You can use the idea, but you have to give the source. It is not clear
for many new comers and students. Wolfram Inc marketed the book in 80
vigorously to the industry.
The book has no BNF grammar description. Its an intellectual crime
perpetrated on the students. The way he approaches is not by concepts
which would entail explaining the fact this it was immitated and
regurgitated from LISP as well as the Meta CIRCULAR interpreter. Paul
Graham is in contrast commendable and Intellectually honest.
No, McCarthy does not steal. The very fact that he uses the word
LAMBDA and gives reference to the origins. Wolfram's 1988 book does
not say that its a transmogrification of LISP and that he got the
interpreter most definitely by reading one of his papers.
What about the copyright being assigned to his graduate school ? Did
he use any university computer to do the thesis and university
professor as his advisor ?
It is not about FEELING. Its about PRACTICE. Its about ETHICS !!! The
coming generations need this when they read and study.
Hey Sycophant, What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
Hey Sycophant, What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
Hey Sycophant, What is the DEFINITION of PLAGIARISM ?
> >> Is it ETHICAL to use a SEMINAL IDEA from someone and not GIVE
> >> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ?
>
> > Many scientists are using theories they don't feel required
> > to give credit for to anyone. - Why? - Because those to whom
> > they might have given credit are so well known by all who
> > are in the know that is not really necessary to even mention
> > them - although, of course, one might want mention them
> > anyway (as to the ignoramuses: those names would be
> > without any deeper meaning to them).
>
> Well, the original poster also did not give credit to "Mein Kampf" and
> its preceding works reaching right back into Middle Ages and beyond.
I see that you derive your inspiration from there. I never had the
time to read that crap.
Kastrup, Why dont you take some jews in your home in germany and
DEMONSTRATE your REMORSE ????
Why dont you take some jews in your home in germany and DEMONSTRATE
your REMORSE ????
The evidence on nkusa.org is there that hitler contracted with
zionists to expel the jews. the zionists were the armed guards of the
auschwitz and the german nation was behind hitler.
nanothermite911fbibustards
But thanks to David Kastrup for taking an UNQUALIFIED position. I now
know what is his philosophy in part and why his posts on the ctt are
not as fruitful anymore. Is he a businessman now after retirement ?