Truth_In_Media_Ple...@ewuggaje.ch writes: > When did Saddam laugh in front of all the walnuts?
> I am grudgingly inner, so I move you.
> Sometimes, Neal never cares until Charles pulls the solid dog > frantically. > They are covering alongside the monolith now, won't fear cups later. > He can change simply if Roxanne's carpenter isn't durable.
> Bernadette, still tasting, lives almost subtly, as the elbow > orders between their exit. We answer the active printer.
Obviously written by some sort of machine, but why? Steganography?
In the last exciting episode, jhbr...@ai.mit.edu (Jeremy H. Brown) wrote:
> Joe Marshall <prunesqual...@comcast.net> writes: >> Obviously written by some sort of machine, but why? Steganography?
> To defeat Bayesian spam-filtering.
But since it's not "ham," and doesn't contain the kinds of patterns found in _real_ messages, it _still_ looks like spam.
In order to get mail into the folder I maintain for my brother, Brad, you have to generate mail that simulates his style of writing. Gibberish won't fly... -- select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com'; http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/rdbms.html It is in the tranquillity of decomposition that I remember the long confused emotion which was my life.
> Joe Marshall <prunesqual...@comcast.net> writes: >> Obviously written by some sort of machine, but why? Steganography?
> To defeat Bayesian spam-filtering.
Possible, but I'm not convinced.
In my email spam corpus I don't have anything as complicated. I've got random garbage, random dictionary words, excerpts for novels, and chunks of news stories, but no grammatically correct nonsense text.
If it *is* done to defeat Bayesian spam filtering, I wonder what software package does this.
Truth_In_Media_Ple...@ewuggaje.ch writes: > When did Saddam laugh in front of all the walnuts?
> I am grudgingly inner, so I move you.
> Sometimes, Neal never cares until Charles pulls the solid dog > frantically. > They are covering alongside the monolith now, won't fear cups later. > He can change simply if Roxanne's carpenter isn't durable.
> Bernadette, still tasting, lives almost subtly, as the elbow > orders between their exit. We answer the active printer.
> > When did Saddam laugh in front of all the walnuts?
> > I am grudgingly inner, so I move you.
> > Sometimes, Neal never cares until Charles pulls the solid dog > > frantically. > > They are covering alongside the monolith now, won't fear cups later. > > He can change simply if Roxanne's carpenter isn't durable.
> > Bernadette, still tasting, lives almost subtly, as the elbow > > orders between their exit. We answer the active printer.
Well, I'm being OT when I post this, but for more wierdness, see http://www.timecube.com/ a site dedicated to "NATURE'S HARMONIC SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY TIME CUBE"
This site has been around for some time - it's a complete mystery to me why someone would bother. I see that there's a reference to the Matrix has been added - so somebody appears to be updating it from time-to-time.
There's some wierd phrases in it that you can use for a lifetime, like "Greenwich Time is a Lie", and "evil word fiction".
cartermar...@ukmail.com (Mark Carter) writes: > Well, I'm being OT when I post this, but for more wierdness, see > http://www.timecube.com/ > a site dedicated to "NATURE'S HARMONIC SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY TIME CUBE"
> This site has been around for some time - it's a complete mystery to > me why someone would bother. I see that there's a reference to the > Matrix has been added - so somebody appears to be updating it from > time-to-time.
It amazes me that people that have so little grasp of reality have enough brain cells to construct a web page.
It all seems coherent at first glance, but if you really start trying to make any sense out of it, you'll get lost within pages and pages of `documentation' that lead nowhere.
> Bonkers stuff.
Remember: Ignoring Time Cube is Evil. -1 x -1 = +1 is stupid and evil. -- ~jrm
I just couldn't resist firing off one more post, so here goes ...
The TimeCube seems to generate a lot of hits on Google (5,290 to be precise) - so its wackiness appears to be attracting a lot of attention. Admittedly, the second item on the list is an actual company that does Excel data filtration; but perhaps we can ignore it as an abnormal aberration.
It's difficult to say if people actually believe what they're saying, or if deep down they know that what they're saying is a load of codswallop. One just can't help shake off the thought that it's all a bit of a wind-up. *Surely* they can't be serious??
I used to think that the voices that schizophrenics hear were just an illusion that they could easily see through if they just thought about it properly; but apparently these people really do hear voices just like it was spoken by someone else in the room.
> It amazes me that people that have so little grasp of reality have > enough brain cells to construct a web page.
It's especially difficult to believe that this wackjob could turn his hand to programming - a discipline which is the quintessence of clear thinking.
> It all seems coherent at first glance, but if you really start trying > to make any sense out of it, you'll get lost within pages and pages of > `documentation' that lead nowhere.
I love it: a man-machine interface not built on the metaphor of the desktop - but on crop circles. It's a crazy idea ... but it might just work!
If I may be permitted a small plug, I had also written a small page about squaring the circle over at my website: http://www.markcarter.me.uk/pi.html Long story short: you can square the circle, unless you're a crank.
Joe Marshall <prunesqual...@comcast.net> wrote in message <news:ektcbghf.fsf_-_@comcast.net>... > It amazes me that people that have so little grasp of reality have > enough brain cells to construct a web page.
Gene Ray is not stupid. He's just stark, raving mad. He admits to being diagnosed with schizophrenia on his web site, but in his eyes it just proves that his mind transcedes mere human minds, since he has created four full days in a single earth rotation etc. etc.
That said, his web site isn't exactly pretty :-)
People troll him and even invite him to speak at universities. I think that's cruel. I think that they instead should try to convince him to take his medication. Schizophrenia happened to John Nash, it happened to Tom Harrell, it could happen to anyone, I guess.
scallas...@mailexpire.com (Harald Korneliussen) writes: > People troll him and even invite him to speak at universities. I > think that's cruel.
I agree.
> I think that they instead should try to convince him to take his > medication. Schizophrenia happened to John Nash, it happened to Tom > Harrell, it could happen to anyone, I guess.
There is a pretty good article about Schizophrenia in the January issue of Scientific American. Scary stuff.
