Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Could somebody use SCSH, Sheme, or Lisp to create the "Lispm" architecture.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Anne & Lynn Wheeler  
View profile  
 More options Apr 1 2003, 2:22 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme.scsh, comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.lisp, comp.arch, alt.folklore.computers
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <l...@garlic.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:22:58 GMT
Local: Tues, Apr 1 2003 2:22 pm
Subject: Re: Could somebody use SCSH, Sheme, or Lisp to create the "Lispm" architecture.

Symbolics_XL1201_Sebek_Budo_Ka...@hotmail.com (Franz Kafka) writes:
> The only important thing is to not tie the Lispm to a specific chip,
> or Machine like Symbolics, LMI, Xerox, TI, and the Scheme Chip did
> but to make it able to run on all hardware--so that more people
> could try it out.

> Porting Linux into a Lisp/Scheme OS would be a great start.

slight drift regarding mit lisp machine & 801 circa 1979 ...
see last ref at
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#65 801 (was re: reviving Multics)
appears just before the next posting at:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#66 History of project maintenance tools ... what and when

--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.