what about a rails-based gforge like? - comp.lang.ruby

Message from discussion what about a rails-based gforge like?
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!skynet.be!newspost001!tjb!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 02:05:59 +0100
From: Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwants...@skynetnospam.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
Subject: what about a rails-based gforge like?
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <42324094$0$28072$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>
Organization: -= Belgacom Usenet Service =-
NNTP-Posting-Host: f7cfb5e8.news.skynet.be
X-Trace: 1110589588 news.skynet.be 28072 80.200.189.20:10855
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@skynet.be

Hello!

Motivated people have recently formed the VIT (visual identity team). I believe 
they tend to work with rails. And I think rubyforge is on their roadmap. Are 
these statements exact?

So, when ruby-lang is done, when ruby-doc is done and when time comes to tackle 
rubyforge visual identity with rails help, how will they painlessly fullfill 
that work without a previously well prepared rails-based replacement for GForge?

Then my question is, isn't there a need for a rails-based gforge like framework?

What do you all think about this?

Regards,
Lionel Thiry