ruby 1.8.4 released
Yukihiro Matsumoto
Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/ruby-1.8.4.tar.gz
md5sum bd8c2e593e1fa4b01fd98eaf016329bb
ChangeLogs can be found at
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.8/ChangeLog-1.8.4
And summarized in Japanese at
http://www.ruby-lang.org/ja/man/?cmd=view;name=ruby+1.8.4+feature
The above page is reserved to translated to English; volunteers are
welcome.
Happy Hacking.
matz.
Tim Heaney
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
Ossum! I was just thinking about this and then you posted! I mean, We
had 1.8.1 two years ago and 1.8.2 last year. Since 1.8.3 was already
released, I was thinking we weren't going to get a Christmas present
this year. I haven't been paying attention to the realease candidates,
I guess. What a nice surprise!
Thanks and Merry Christmas to you to!
Tim
Robert McGovern
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
Thank you Matz and to everyone else for your hard work!
Merry Christmas to you all and I hope you'se have a fantastic New Year.
Rob
Ross Bamford
<ma...@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
>
Thankyou!! And merry Christmas to you, thanks for everyone's hard work :)
> Happy Hacking.
>
Just a bit ;)
--
Ross Bamford - ro...@roscopeco.remove.co.uk
Christian Neukirchen
Seconded.
http://chneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2005/12/merry-christmas.html
> Rob
--
Christian Neukirchen <chneuk...@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org
Jellen
Last year, we have Ruby 1.8.2 at Christmas;
and this year we have Ruby 1.8.4, Great work!
Merry Christmas to you and the ruby-core-dev group!
Antonio Cangiano
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
This is great, matz. Thank you so much for this Xmas present.
Quoting from my blog: "At this point, matz can be considered a sort of
Japanese Santa Claus for all us grown-up geek children ;-)"
Cheers,
--
Antonio Cangiano
My Ruby blog: http://www.antoniocangiano.com
Curt Hibbs
>
> Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
>
>
> matz.
Thansk, Matz!
To those people who are wondering when the One-Click Ruby Installer
for Windows for 1.8.4 will be released, it will be as soon as possibe,
but it will probably be at least a few weeks. It is my top priority
task, but I want to make sure that most of the issues with the current
release are fixed.
Thanks for you patience.
Curt
Ezra Zygmuntowicz
Thank you Matz! Happy Holidays to everyone!
-Ezra
Tom Copeland
>
> Ruby 1.8.4 has been released.
>
> ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/ruby-1.8.4.tar.gz
> md5sum bd8c2e593e1fa4b01fd98eaf016329bb
Mirrored here:
http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=426
Thank you to the Ruby development team, and Merry Christmas to all!
Yours,
Tom
Do Re Mi chel La Si Do
And, also ActiveRuby 1.8.4.0
Here : http://arton.hp.infoseek.co.jp/index.html
THANKS!!!
Michel Claveau
Eric Christensen
> To those people who are wondering when the One-Click Ruby Installer
> for Windows for 1.8.4 will be released, it will be as soon as possibe,
> but it will probably be at least a few weeks. It is my top priority
> task, but I want to make sure that most of the issues with the current
> release are fixed.
>
> Thanks for you patience.
>
> Curt
Let me know if you would like a copy of Visual Studio 2005.
Google mail: ericrchr
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Austin Ziegler
I am currently going through the process of trying to compile Ruby
1.8.4 with VS2005 C++ Express with the Windows 2003 SP1 Platform SDK.
-austin
--
Austin Ziegler * halos...@gmail.com
* Alternate: aus...@halostatue.ca
Curt Hibbs
Curt
Bennett, Patrick
Patrick
Austin Ziegler
> Better optimizations...
At least in theory, yes. More importantly: 1) it is now the supported
version of the compiler; 2) the PSDK includes the support necessary to
support Win32 and Win64 (both x86-64 and IA64). Both Microsoft and
Apple have placed big bets on x86-64, so compiling with the proper
compiler will at least make it that much easier to work with when we
start compiling for Win64.
Austin Ziegler
> On 27/12/05, Bennett, Patrick <Patrick...@inin.com> wrote:
> > Better optimizations...
>
> At least in theory, yes. More importantly: 1) it is now the supported
> version of the compiler; 2) the PSDK includes the support necessary to
> support Win32 and Win64 (both x86-64 and IA64). Both Microsoft and
> Apple have placed big bets on x86-64, so compiling with the proper
> compiler will at least make it that much easier to work with when we
> start compiling for Win64.
..on the other hand, it will face the same difficulty that is still
currently faced from time to time with respect to VC6 extensions
working with VC7 and VC7.1 extensions. I am looking at recompiling
everything that the winstaller uses with VC8 (which is, in fact
version 14 of the compiler). You'll see that there are a few
incompatibilities with the Ruby build process if you look on
ruby-core.
Curt Hibbs
limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.
Curt
On 12/27/05, Austin Ziegler <halos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27/12/05, Austin Ziegler <halos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 27/12/05, Bennett, Patrick <Patrick...@inin.com> wrote:
> > > Better optimizations...
> >
> > At least in theory, yes. More importantly: 1) it is now the supported
> > version of the compiler; 2) the PSDK includes the support necessary to
> > support Win32 and Win64 (both x86-64 and IA64). Both Microsoft and
> > Apple have placed big bets on x86-64, so compiling with the proper
> > compiler will at least make it that much easier to work with when we
> > start compiling for Win64.
>
> ...on the other hand, it will face the same difficulty that is still
nobuyoshi nakada
At Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:59:12 +0900,
Curt Hibbs wrote in [ruby-talk:172735]:
> I think I'm going to stick with VC++ 7.1 for this round. I have a
> limited amount of time, and I know people are anxious to get their
> hands on a 1.8.4 version of the one-click installer.
I rather recommend VC6 or gcc -mnocygwin.
--
Nobu Nakada
George Moschovitis
-g.
--
http://www.gmosx.com
http://www.navel.gr
http://www.nitrohq.com
Glenn Smith
(sadly very little opportunity to use Ruby these days and worse, my beloved
Ruby manuals were burnt to a cinder when our building came-a-cropper from
the Hemel Buncefield Oil-Depot "disaster").
Anyway, the Windows installer for Ruby is still 1.8.2-15 - is this still the
one most people use, or is there a "better way" to get and use Ruby now on a
Windows platform?
Merry Christmas/HNY all!
Glenn
--
All the best
Glenn
Aylesbury, UK
James Britt
> I haven't been around for a while so sorry to dive in all of a sudden again
> (sadly very little opportunity to use Ruby these days and worse, my beloved
> Ruby manuals were burnt to a cinder when our building came-a-cropper from
> the Hemel Buncefield Oil-Depot "disaster").
>
> Anyway, the Windows installer for Ruby is still 1.8.2-15 - is this still the
> one most people use, or is there a "better way" to get and use Ruby now on a
> Windows platform?
Patience.
1.8.2-15 is the current version.
But grep the recent archives for questions on the 1.8.4 version.
James
--
http://www.ruby-doc.org - Ruby Help & Documentation
http://www.artima.com/rubycs/ - Ruby Code & Style: Writers wanted
http://www.rubystuff.com - The Ruby Store for Ruby Stuff
http://www.jamesbritt.com - Playing with Better Toys
http://www.30secondrule.com - Building Better Tools
Glenn Smith
Cheers
Glenn The Firefighter