Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jamesl  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2009, 7:40 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Apr 25 2009 7:40 pm
Subject: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
Hi,

I'm wondering if anyone would like to see a Concurrent Library for
Ruby, like the Java javax.concurrent library ?

I know you can just use this library from jruby, but Im thinking more
of a idiomatic Ruby library, which could also be used ontop of jruby.

If you are interested having such a library please can you let me know
via an email to james <underscore> ladd <at> hotmail <dot> com ?

Rgs, James.
www.jamesladdcode.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tony Arcieri  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2009, 8:52 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Tony Arcieri <t...@medioh.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:52:37 -0500
Local: Sat, Apr 25 2009 8:52 pm
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
[Note:  parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:45 PM, jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone would like to see a Concurrent Library for
> Ruby, like the Java javax.concurrent library ?

There are quite a few libraries that provide concurrency strategies already

--
Tony Arcieri
medioh.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jamesl  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2009, 9:05 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Apr 25 2009 9:05 pm
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
On Apr 26, 10:52 am, Tony Arcieri <t...@medioh.com> wrote:

> [Note:  parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:45 PM, jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if anyone would like to see a Concurrent Library for
> > Ruby, like the Java javax.concurrent library ?

> There are quite a few libraries that provide concurrency strategies already

> --
> Tony Arcieri
> medioh.com

Like ?  Do you have a few URL's to share?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jamesl  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2009, 11:40 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Apr 25 2009 11:40 pm
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?

> Like ?  Do you have a few URL's to share?

Not sure why I didnt find this the other day
http://moonbase.rydia.net/mental/blog/programming/the-future-of-the-o...

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Suresh Kk  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2009, 12:44 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Suresh Kk <sureshkk...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:44:15 -0500
Local: Sun, Apr 26 2009 12:44 am
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?

jamesl wrote:
> Hi,

> I'm wondering if anyone would like to see a Concurrent Library for
> Ruby, like the Java javax.concurrent library ?

> I know you can just use this library from jruby, but Im thinking more
> of a idiomatic Ruby library, which could also be used ontop of jruby.

> If you are interested having such a library please can you let me know
> via an email to james <underscore> ladd <at> hotmail <dot> com ?

> Rgs, James.
> www.jamesladdcode.com

I'm wondering if anyone would like to see a Concurrent Library for
Ruby, like the Java javax.concurrent library ?

Please have a look at revactor
http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/31492/revactor-0.1.4.gem
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Klemme  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2009, 5:53 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:53:42 -0500
Local: Sun, Apr 26 2009 5:53 am
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
2009/4/26 jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com>:

> I'm wondering if anyone would like to see a Concurrent Library for
> Ruby, like the Java javax.concurrent library ?

Some building blocks are part of the standard library already: Mutex,
Monitor, MonitorMixin, Queue.

> If you are interested having such a library please can you let me know
> via an email to james <underscore> ladd <at> hotmail <dot> com ?

This is a public forum. Why should only you benefit from answers?

Kind regards

robert

--
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tony Arcieri  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2009, 1:04 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Tony Arcieri <t...@medioh.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:04:14 -0500
Local: Sun, Apr 26 2009 1:04 pm
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
[Note:  parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:10 PM, jamesl <ladd.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Like ?  Do you have a few URL's to share?

Well, I'm not sure what you're after.  Two libraries for actor-based
concurrency (one of them mine) have been linked, but those aren't really
anything like java.util.concurrent.

Are you wanting a small framework for backgrounding work into "thread"
pools? (which would more likely be implemented as process pools)

Ruby's threads provide only sequential execution, since Ruby's memory model
is inherently sequential.  For concurrent processing it's best to farm
things off to additional processes so that the OS's scheduler can make them
concurrent.  There are packages to do this as well (e.g. BackgroundDRb)

--
Tony Arcieri
medioh.com


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Louis-Philippe  
View profile  
 More options Apr 27 2009, 10:59 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Louis-Philippe <defa...@spiralix.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:59:15 -0500
Local: Mon, Apr 27 2009 10:59 am
Subject: Re: Concurrent GEM for Ruby ?
[Note:  parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

If you are looking for a process pool or similar,
http://abundance.rubyforge.org/
it forks an n amount of concurrent process workers then seed/harvest them by
unix sockets communication,

2009/4/26 Tony Arcieri <t...@medioh.com>


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »