Why does ActiveRecord, for instance, not use DBI? Not only would it
standardize adapters, it would solve a lot of performance issues - such
as http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/67087 and
http://www.voxclandestina.com/ruby/rails/2005-05-24/improving-activerecord-part-1/
.
Yes, development is active. I forget exactly who by, but if you look in
the archives, you can probably find out.
> Why does ActiveRecord, for instance, not use DBI? Not only would it
> standardize adapters, it would solve a lot of performance issues - such
> as http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/67087 and
> http://www.voxclandestina.com/ruby/rails/2005-05-24/improving-activerecord-part-1/
Consider ActiveRecord a peer and an alternative to DBI. Perhaps, though,
a more mature DBI could be used in the way you suggest.
Cheers,
Dave