Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Whither Ruby DBI?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
listr...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Jun 11 2006, 10:22 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: listr...@gmail.com
Date: 11 Jun 2006 07:22:19 -0700
Local: Sun, Jun 11 2006 10:22 am
Subject: Whither Ruby DBI?
I see that Ruby DBI is still on version 0.10.  Is development active?

Why does ActiveRecord, for instance, not use DBI?  Not only would it
standardize adapters, it would solve a lot of performance issues - such
as http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/67087 and
http://www.voxclandestina.com/ruby/rails/2005-05-24/improving-activer...
.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dave Burt  
View profile  
 More options Jun 14 2006, 1:31 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Dave Burt <d...@burt.id.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:31:08 GMT
Local: Wed, Jun 14 2006 1:31 pm
Subject: Re: Whither Ruby DBI?

listr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I see that Ruby DBI is still on version 0.10.  Is development active?

Yes, development is active. I forget exactly who by, but if you look in
the archives, you can probably find out.

> Why does ActiveRecord, for instance, not use DBI?  Not only would it
> standardize adapters, it would solve a lot of performance issues - such
> as http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/67087 and
> http://www.voxclandestina.com/ruby/rails/2005-05-24/improving-activer...

Consider ActiveRecord a peer and an alternative to DBI. Perhaps, though,
a more mature DBI could be used in the way you suggest.

Cheers,
Dave


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google