Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
ruby-dev summary 26325-26385
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Masayoshi TAKAHASHI  
View profile  
 More options Jul 4 2005, 1:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
From: Masayoshi TAKAHASHI <m...@rubycolor.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:00:05 +0900
Local: Mon, Jul 4 2005 1:00 am
Subject: ruby-dev summary 26325-26385
Hi all,

This is a summary of ruby-dev mailing list in these days.

  [ruby-dev:26324] XMLRPC charset

Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA suggested that the default charset of
xmlrpc library should be UTF-8.

In RFC3023, MIME and XML processors MUST assume that
the charset of text/xml with omitted charset parameter
is "us-ascii."  So strict server/client cannot use
non-ascii characters with this implementation.

  [ruby-dev:26367] Security problem with xmlrpc

Takahiro Kambe reported that he received a notification
of a security problem with xmlrpc:

        http://secunia.com/advisories/15767/

In Ruby CVS HEAD, lib/xmlrpc/utils.rb had one-liner fix
but it was not applied in 1.8 branch.
This mail had no reply, but 1.8 branch was fixed.

  [ruby-dev:26375] shebang without "ruby"

When Ruby executes a shebang script, Ruby interpreter checks shebang
line and if there are no string "ruby", she kick the program in
shebang line.

nobu nakada made a patch, because he guessed this function had
no necessity. He proposed a new behavior:

  * consider shebang without "ruby" as -x option without argument

Receiving the comment, Matz proposed another behavior:

  * consider shebang without "ruby" as just a comment (ignore options
    in the line)

Regards,

Masayoshi 'Maki' Takahashi (m...@rubycolor.org)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google