Microsoft research on code quality

[Aahz]

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx
--
Aahz (aa...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

[on old computer technologies and programmers] "Fancy tail fins on a
brand new '59 Cadillac didn't mean throwing out a whole generation of
mechanics who started with model As." --Andrew Dalke

[exa...@twistedmatrix.com]

On 09:15 pm, aa...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
>http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx

Thanks for passing on the link. It's really encouraging to see people
starting to do empirical research in this area.

Jean-Paul

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Aahz a �crit :
> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx

An interesting reading. Thanks for the link.

[Mensanator]

On Nov 6, 3:15 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx
> --
> Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)           <*>        http://www.pythoncraft.com/

>
> [on old computer technologies and programmers]  "Fancy tail fins on a
> brand new '59 Cadillac didn't mean throwing out a whole generation of
> mechanics who started with model As."  --Andrew Dalke

Microsoft has more to answer for for the fuckups they install
deliberately than for the bugs that get in accidentally.

[Mark Leander]

> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx

Thanks for the link! Hope he next takes on verifying that less code
implies less bugs when
other factors are constant, thus proving that Python is better than C
and Java :-).

Mark

[r]

On Nov 7, 5:22 pm, Mensanator <mensana...@aol.com> wrote:
> Microsoft has more to answer for for the fuckups they install
> deliberately than for the bugs that get in accidentally.

Here!, Here! Very well put Mensanator!