Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Python 3 Q & A (Nick C.) updated
24 views
Skip to first unread message
Terry Reedy
Jan 6, 2014, 9:07:03 PM1/6/14
to pytho...@python.org
As a counterpoint to 2 versus 3:
http://python-notes.curiousefficiency.org/en/latest/python3/questions_and_answers.html
by Nick Coughlan, one of Python's major core developers.
A couple of points related to the other threads.
1. There were real social and technical reasons for the non-2.8 pep (404).
2. Python 3 is a work in progress with respect to the new text model. In
particular wire protocol programming is a known problem area and will
get attention. But it is only a small part of the total Python universe.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
http://python-notes.curiousefficiency.org/en/latest/python3/questions_and_answers.html
by Nick Coughlan, one of Python's major core developers.
A couple of points related to the other threads.
1. There were real social and technical reasons for the non-2.8 pep (404).
2. Python 3 is a work in progress with respect to the new text model. In
particular wire protocol programming is a known problem area and will
get attention. But it is only a small part of the total Python universe.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
0 new messages