Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion best way to learn
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Geoff Howland  
View profile  
 More options Oct 22 2002, 12:51 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: Geoff Howland <ghowl...@lupineNO.SPAMgames.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 04:51:41 GMT
Local: Tues, Oct 22 2002 12:51 am
Subject: Re: best way to learn

On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 20:20:20 -0700 (PDT), ed <coo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hey all.  I'm a python newbie, but I have experience
>in other very high level languages, mainly php.  
>I was wondering what is the best way to become
>proficient in python quickly?  

I would say this is similar for all languages.  You should pick a
project that interests you, but is not so complex you cant just start
working on it, and that will drag you along having to learn the
language.

>Should I get a book, if so which one?  
>"Learning python", "programming python", "python
>cookbook"?
>Or can I get pretty much everything I need on the web,
>like a lot of good tutorials and some good language references?

I found the python tutorial pages on the python.org site, and the
modules to answer a lot of my inital questions.  So they are a good
part of it.

I also bought 'Core Python Programming' by Wesley J. Chun (Prentice
Hall) and it's been very useful.  I use its tables on dict/string/list
functions enough I should probably photocopy them, or get a memory.
:)

>If I get a book I'd like to get one that works as a
>newbie tutorial but by the end of the book deals with some advanced
>topics and will also work somewhat well as a reference.  Is that
>asking too much?

Might be, others may have advice on books that actually do this.  I
haven't found many that actually seem to work at the right pace for
the amount of material they have to cover in a coherent manner.
That's why I suggest the 'pick a project' method.  Once you've done
one, refactor it and/or do another and keep going.

Making things work in a non-trivial project will cause you to hit your
toe against quite a few walls until you find your light switch.  Then
new programs explore new territory...

-Geoff Howland
http://ludumdare.com/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google