Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz)
Date: 16 Mar 2008 17:09:02 -0700
Local: Sun, Mar 16 2008 8:09 pm
Subject: PyCon Feedback and Volunteers (Re: Pycon disappointment)
[warning: rant ahead]
[[ For the conference: For the tutorials: In article <5776428b-82b3-4921-945a-69beab134...@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, fumanchu <fuman...@aminus.org> wrote: Let's leave aside the issue of how sponsor talks were handled: assuming >This is my third PyCon, and I've found a reasonably-sized cadre of that there's general agreement that this year was a failed experiment, fixing it is easy. What you're bringing up here is a much more difficult issue, and it is, Moreover, PyCon's success rests on many legs: tutorials, Open Space, Finally, trying to satisfy a thousand people is impossible. People who Now the rant: If you did not like the programming this year (aside from the sponsor PyCon is built on the backs of its volunteers. I personally spent more None of the speakers received any kind of honorarium. Except for keynote There are no requirements for volunteering other than a willingness to PyCon is what YOU make of it. If you want to change PyCon, propose a This doesn't mean that we are uninterested in feedback. We love "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||