Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
comp.lang.python
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion I need test .py files
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Stefan Franke  
View profile  
 More options Apr 27 1999, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: spamfra...@bigfoot.de (Stefan Franke)
Date: 1999/04/27
Subject: Re: I need test .py files
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 19:10:49 +0300, Raul Parra Bacete FS <rpa...@abo.fi> wrote:

>Hi,

>I have ported the python interpreter to the sh1 hitachi,

Raul,
as I remember from your previous posts, you were trying
to build a stripped off (WRT OS and file system specific
modules) Python interpreter for an embedded system
context.

Your mail lets me assume you succeeded :-) Can you
summarize you experiences when you are finished?

It would be very cool to have a kind of "Minimal core
Python" configure option in the standard distribution
as a starting point for similar tasks!

About a year ago I was in the position to make
suggestions for a scripting language in an embedded
application to my ex-employer, with a main focus on
immediate availability.
I chose LUA, Scheme, Tcl 7.6, Python (in this order),
but have loved to see Python in a better rank.
Unfortunately the porting effort seemed quite high.

Stefan

PS: Finally they chose a yucky BASIC interpreter - for them
a known language available at no cost. What they left out
of consideration was that there were no interfacing or
wrapping possibilities (like SWIG) at all...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google