Received: by 10.180.101.9 with SMTP id fc9mr1587357wib.3.1350183566647; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Path: q10ni65116190wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.12.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.ams.xsnews.nl!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-l...@python.org Delivered-To: python-l...@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'url:sourceforge': 0.03; 'cpython': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'pep': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'static': 0.13; 'fine.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:analysis': 0.16; 'subject:tools': 0.16; 'tool.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'windows': 0.19; 'python?': 0.20; 'written': 0.20; '3.2': 0.22; "i've": 0.23; 'project,': 0.24; "we'd": 0.24; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'arguments.': 0.29; 'dan': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; "we're": 0.30; 'keyword': 0.30; 'asking': 0.32; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; "aren't": 0.33; 'traditional': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'doing': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'far': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'analysis': 0.70; 'opensource': 0.84; 'played': 0.84; 'aka': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-l...@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Static analysis tools Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:39:01 +0100 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-189-214.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121011-0, 11/10/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-l...@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 32 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1349977126 news.xs4all.nl 6842 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38873 X-Complaints-To: ab...@xs4all.nl Bytes: 4182 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/10/2012 18:25, Dan Stromberg wrote: > I'm familiar with pylint, and have recently played with pyflakes and > flake8. I've also heard of pychecker. > > Are there others, perhaps including some that aren't written in Python, but > still check Python? > > We're considering doing static analysis of a large CPython 3.2 project, but > so far the traditional 3 seem to be coming up a little short for Python > 3 compatibility. Especially, they don't seem to understand PEP 3102 > AKA Keyword Only Arguments, and we really like Keyword Only Arguments. > > Opensource would be great,but we'd also be willing to pay for a suitable > tool. > > Windows or *ix tools would be fine. > > Any suggestions about things to check into? > > > I've found clonedigger very useful http://clonedigger.sourceforge.net/ Not what you're asking for but figleaf is good as well http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/figleaf/doc/ -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.