On 2012-07-30, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote:
> Still, you may still get away with the above statement by providing aIt's not really relevent to this discussion, but there is _lots_ of
> sufficiently narrow definition of "standalone". By my definition, there
> isn't much "standalone" code out there. Most code I know interfaces with a
> couple of external tools, libraries or backends, usually written in
> languages I don't have to care about because they provide a language
> independent interface.
stand-alone code out there. It runs in sub-one-dollar microcontrollers
that are programmed in assembly language or in C without external
libraries (sometimes not even the "libc" that's included in the C
language definition). Those microcontrollers are everywhere in toys,
appliances, and all sorts of other "non-computer" things.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.