Message from discussion
Tcl vs. Python for Scripting C Statistical Library
From: Lyn A Headley <lahea...@boguscs.uchicago.edu>
Subject: Re: Tcl vs. Python for Scripting C Statistical Library
Date: 1998/03/09
Message-ID: <wr3k9a4pr12.fsf@harper.uchicago.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 332094571
Sender: lahea...@harper.uchicago.edu
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: harper.uchicago.edu
References: <ydxvhtrxz0h.fsf@hustat.harvard.edu> <3501DC3F.F97E28F3@pdq.net> <X7MUZDAFHfA1Ew9G@jessikat.demon.co.uk>
Organization: University of Chicago -- Academic Computing Services
Newsgroups: comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.python
>>>>> "Robin" == Robin Becker <ro...@jessikat.demon.co.uk> writes:
Robin> I use Tcl and have been trying to use Python. I hate and
Robin> love things about both. My principle beef with python is
Robin> the use of invisible structuring ie white space
Robin> counts. Would it really have made that much difference to
Robin> the language to have a statement terminator? An occasional
I don't think this makes sense. The issue of white-space
"structuring" is one of statement *grouping*, not statement
termination. If python's statement terminator were ';' instead of
newline, that wouldn't change anything about its use of indentation.
It would just make blocks look like this:
if foo:
foo1();
foo2();
foo3();
instead of
if foo:
foo1()
foo2()
foo3()
--
Lyn Headley
remove the word "bogus" from my address for the real one.