Received: by 10.66.73.7 with SMTP id h7mr3567574pav.6.1350405409542;
        Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: jt13ni16594pbb.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <andriy.kornats...@live.com>
X-Original-To: python-l...@python.org
Delivered-To: python-l...@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'cache': 0.05; '*not*':
	0.07; 'see.': 0.07; 'used.': 0.07; 'cached': 0.09; 'construed':
	0.09; 'pylons,': 0.09; 'second.': 0.09; 'supported.': 0.09;
	'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'django': 0.10; ';-)': 0.11;
	'times,': 0.13; 'slightly': 0.15; '"hello': 0.16; 'backward':
	0.16; 'caching': 0.16; 'deprecate': 0.16; 'deprecated.': 0.16;
	'did).': 0.16; 'hard-coded': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'pressed':
	0.16; 'typo': 0.16; 'url:packages': 0.16; 'wording': 0.16; 'wsgi':
	0.16; 'later': 0.16; 'differ': 0.17; 'usability': 0.17;
	'solution.': 0.18; '(not': 0.20; 'mostly': 0.20; 'thanks.': 0.21;
	'driven': 0.22; 'minor': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.23;
	'example': 0.23; 'solutions.': 0.23; 'statement': 0.23;
	'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25;
	'(which': 0.26; '(see': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'initial': 0.28;
	'app.': 0.29; 'context,': 0.29; 'framework': 0.30; 'url:2012':
	0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'problem.': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.32;
	'generally': 0.32; 'not.': 0.32; 'asked': 0.33; 'certain': 0.33;
	'from:addr:live.com': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'project': 0.34;
	'list': 0.35; 'decisions': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35;
	'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'others.': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36;
	'should': 0.36; 'thank': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'being': 0.37;
	'why': 0.37; 'item': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'comment': 0.38;
	'some': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60;
	'easy': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'matter': 0.61; 'real': 0.61;
	'first': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'worth': 0.63; 'world': 0.63;
	'details': 0.63; 'url:blogspot': 0.64; 'other.': 0.64; 'here':
	0.65; 'limit': 0.65; 'due': 0.66; 'below.': 0.68; 'fact,': 0.69;
	'lack': 0.71; 'felt': 0.75; 'url:http': 0.79; 'introduce': 0.80;
	'heavy': 0.83; 'benchmark': 0.84; 'isolated': 0.84; 'more:': 0.84;
	'wish.': 0.84; 'fight': 0.97; 'charset:windows-1251': 0.97
X-Originating-IP: [178.136.241.38]
From: Andriy Kornatskyy <andriy.kornats...@live.com>
To: <demianbre...@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Fastest web framework
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:35:39 +0300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <507D8632.7040...@gmail.com>
References: <DUB117-W80EE2285B5E415AA14B5B991...@phx.gbl>,
	<mailman.2203.1350308439.27098.python-l...@python.org>,
	<8b51748d-0517-4b1d-a0a6-e8fa06dd4...@r10g2000pbd.googlegroups.com>,
	<DUB117-W741B72171E7BBFB4B07D7791...@phx.gbl>,
	<CAE+T62Z7mbRcuhnWJcYQCL5SOQDQou8o6SSR7Hkx+KRj8ey...@mail.gmail.com>
	<DUB117-W27EF5EE49EA42A6CE186E791...@phx.gbl>,
	<507D8632.7040...@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Oct 2012 16:35:40.0235 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[4751B1B0:01CDABBC]
Cc: "python-l...@python.org" <python-l...@python.org>
X-BeenThere: python-l...@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language
	<python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>,
	<mailto:python-list-requ...@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-l...@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-requ...@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>,
	<mailto:python-list-requ...@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2290.1350405408.27098.python-l...@python.org>
Lines: 70
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1350405408 news.xs4all.nl 6842 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36105
X-Complaints-To: ab...@xs4all.nl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Demian=2C

Thank you=2C see below.

> I think that my first batch of questions were slightly out of context=2C
> mostly due to a lack of caffeine first thing in the morning. My
> understanding at the time was that your "an answer to effectivity" was=2C
> in fact=2C a list of highlights for wheezy.web (which is why I asked the
> questions I did). Having said that..
>
> > The initial decisions taken while building a project might be wrong.
> Due to continues backward compatibility=2C you can not change them even
> you wish.
>
> You can always deprecate old functionality in favor of new solutions.
> I'd be hard pressed to find a reason to find a reason why something
> *can't* be deprecated. It may not be easy at times=2C but it should alway=
s
> be doable.

And that is the problem. Some can not deprecate and die (see pylons=2C now =
pyramid). Some can not die nor deprecate (see django).

> > That glue is usability case: recommendation how to use it with one or
> the other.
>
> As long as your framework doesn't require you to fight with it in order
> to use another solution. One of my early gripes with Django for example
> (ages ago) was that it felt like I had to fight the framework in order
> to introduce functionality that wasn't natively supported.
>
> > For you=2C personally=2C let me point this again. N.P.
> >
> > Here is how: use content caching with cache dependency. Read more:
> > http://packages.python.org/wheezy.http/userguide.html#content-cache
>
> It doesn't matter if you're using cached content or not. It will *not*
> be as fast as a hard-coded=2C simple response (not that a static=2C
> hard-coded response is the way to go obviously). I don't think I have to
> get into the details about I/O. My point is simply that the statement
> that a database driven site (cached content or not)=2C *can not* be as
> fast as a "hello world" app. My comment may be construed as being
> nit-picky=2C but I thought it was worth calling out due to the
> matter-of-fact wording that you used.

It does. There is certain level after which performance of `hello world` wi=
ll not differ from real world application. The hardware I used got that lim=
it at 22-24K per second. That is why I made isolated benchmarks. See differ=
ence between wsgi sample and others.

http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/09/python-fastest-web-framework.html

> On a somewhat unrelated note=2C I caught a minor typo in the content-cach=
e
> docs:
>
> "Since there is no heavy processing and just simple operation to get an
> item from cache it should be supper fast"
>
> I don't know about you=2C but my supper generally isn't fast =3B)

You will see. Thanks. supper =3D> super =3B-)

Somewhat later in a week there will be another benchmark for... caching.

Take care.

Andriy
 		 	   		  =