Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

pyQT performance?

87 views
Skip to first unread message

jayde...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 1:24:00 PM9/10/12
to
Anybody has the experience of the performance of the program developed by pyQT? Is it much slower than the one made by QT, such as (20%)?

Vincent Vande Vyvre

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 1:59:14 PM9/10/12
to pytho...@python.org
Le 10/09/12 19:24, jayde...@gmail.com a �crit :
> Anybody has the experience of the performance of the program developed by pyQT? Is it much slower than the one made by QT, such as (20%)?
>
For my experience, 20% is really surestimated.

I'm developping only with PyQt and essentially in the imaging domain
(viewing, transformation)
and I've never seen a difference of processing speed with the same
applications written in C++.

Qt + Python, a very good association.

--
Vincent V.V.
Oqapy <https://launchpad.net/oqapy> . Qarte
<https://launchpad.net/qarte> . PaQager <https://launchpad.net/paqager>

jayde...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 2:29:02 PM9/10/12
to pytho...@python.org
On Monday, September 10, 2012 2:06:59 PM UTC-4, Vincent Vande Vyvre wrote:
> Le 10/09/12 19:24, jayde...@gmail.com a écrit :
Have you ever used py2exe? After converting the python codes to executable, does it save the time of interpreting the script language? Thank a lot!

jayde...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 2:29:02 PM9/10/12
to comp.lan...@googlegroups.com, pytho...@python.org
On Monday, September 10, 2012 2:06:59 PM UTC-4, Vincent Vande Vyvre wrote:
> Le 10/09/12 19:24, jayde...@gmail.com a écrit :

Andrea Crotti

unread,
Sep 10, 2012, 3:34:04 PM9/10/12
to jayde...@gmail.com, pytho...@python.org
On 09/10/2012 07:29 PM, jayde...@gmail.com wrote
> Have you ever used py2exe? After converting the python codes to executable, does it save the time of interpreting the script language? Thank a lot!

Py2exe normally never speeds up anything, simply because it doesn't
convert to executable, but simply
package everything together, so I haven't tried in this particular case
but it shouldn't make a difference..
0 new messages