Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.python
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Porting notmm to pep 3333 and mod_wsgi
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Etienne Robillard  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 8:58 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: Etienne Robillard <animelo...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 20:58:43 -0400
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 8:58 pm
Subject: Porting notmm to pep 3333 and mod_wsgi
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hi,

Has PEP-3333 introduced backward incompatibilities or changes in unicode encoding
and decoding or should this updated pep require python 3 to make mod_wsgi working with wsgi 1.0 (pep-333)
scripts ? Moreover is it possible to use python 2.7 with mod_wsgi at all without the utf-8
encoding errors?

Besides theses minor Unicode encoding problems I'm glad to announce experimental mod_wsgi support for notmm
on python 2.7.3. I will also include a sample app into the next notmm release as a proof-of-concept for Django-based
projects but so far I haven't found more serious problems following the standard documentation in mod_wsgi 3.4...

Furthermore this newer support for mod_wsgi should allow experimented Django developers to use mod_wsgi and Apache as an alternative to FastCGI (and nginx) for serving high-performance Django apps compiled into optimized C bindings using Cython and notmm! :-)  

Cheers,
Etienne

--
Etienne Robillard
Green Tea Hackers Club
Fine Software Carpentry For The Rest Of Us!
http://gthc.org/
e...@gthcfoundation.org

Donations for the notmm project are accepted through Pledgie.com.
For more info please visit:
http://pledgie.com/campaigns/16268


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google