Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Prolog and Tivoli
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
clive spenser  
View profile  
 More options Oct 16 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
From: clive spenser <cl...@lpa.co.uk>
Date: 1998/10/16
Subject: Re: Prolog and Tivoli

Anthony wrote:

> clive spenser wrote:

> > Can we confirm that Prolog is/was a (important) part of Tivoli?

> Yes, it is the basis of the Tivoli Enterprise Console (T/EC) product.
> However, clients do not generally directly work with Prolog.  Tivoli created
> a "rule language" and implemented it in Prolog, and the rule language is
> what most clients work with (actually, many clients actually work with a GUI
> that generates rules in the rule language).  You can pretty much freely mix
> Prolog with the rule language, which is handy for anyone wanting to imbue
> their rules with nifty stuff driven by an inference-engine (Chrysler has
> done this, though I don't know the extent to which they take advantage of
> it).  Tivoli embedded the BIM Prolog product, which is currently owned and
> marketed by IT Masters:

>     http://www.itmasters.com

> In my latest conversation with IT Masters however, they indicated that
> actual information about the embedded version can only be obtained from
> IBM/Tivoli.  The manuals for BIM Prolog cost US$30,000 (that is, you must
> purchase the product to read the manuals); you read that number right, it is
> the cost of a fairly nice car.

> > Is it a success?

> What do you define as success?  :-)  Seriously though, the T/EC is a *very*
> popular product with clients, so IMHO it is a great success.  A license for
> T/EC  is US$65,000, and they sell like hotcakes.

> > How can we find out more?

> Documentation on the rule language is available, though it is slightly
> oblique in a few areas.  Documentation on the embedded BIM Prolog itself
> however, is not generally available unless you are a Tivoli customer, and
> you need to talk to your Tivoli account manager for details.

> > Is anyone able to talk about this in public?

> Yup, it is just that these gorpy details of Tivoli are generally not that
> well known; many clients still work mostly with the GUI of Tivoli, and
> coding in the rule language, much less the Prolog that backs it, is still
> considered a little esoteric at some sites (this is changing though, thank
> goodness).  I consult on Tivoli, and that is the only reason I know this
> trivia.  Feel free to email me for further details.

> ---
> Anthony
> tyen -> at -> netcom -> dot -> com

Anthony,

Many thnx for your mail; I have already had a reply from Philippe
Moitroux, President and CEO IT Masters, and have recommended that
IT Masters be invited as keynote speakers for next year's PAP99
(PACLP99) conference.

Your decsription reminds me of the ProcessWise application from TeamWare
(used to be ICL), where they adopted Prolog + flex to provide a rule
language to support the construction of business rules within their BPR
package;
and a few serious users as a result got as far as the underlying Prolog.

It could well be that T/EC is the most widely deployed Prolog
application currently in existance! (as well as one of the most
expensive!).

It just goes to show that you can make money out of Prolog.

Clive Spenser
LPA


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.