Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
wouldnt prolog make a great singles matching app?
33 views
Skip to first unread message
johannes falcone
Apr 25, 2013, 5:14:38 PM4/25/13
to
I think prolog could excel at this.
Could you use an rdf triplestore instead of mysql as the database?
Could you use an rdf triplestore instead of mysql as the database?
ses
May 14, 2013, 8:57:17 AM5/14/13
to
In short, yes. I think it has been used several times for matching rules engines in dating websites.
Graham Cooper
May 25, 2013, 10:47:00 PM5/25/13
to
On Apr 26, 7:14 am, johannes falcone <visphatesj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think prolog could excel at this.
>
> Could you use an rdf triplestore instead of mysql as the database?
www.BlockProlog.com uses MySQL Database.
> I think prolog could excel at this.
>
> Could you use an rdf triplestore instead of mysql as the database?
I have to increase VarChar to 255 to do any applications..
How are you going to compete against FriendFinder.com they do interest
matching compatibility already?
Herc
Dhu on Gate
May 28, 2013, 4:07:14 AM5/28/13
to
Dhu
--
Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco.
Graham Cooper
May 28, 2013, 7:43:43 PM5/28/13
to
On May 28, 6:07 pm, Dhu on Gate <campb...@neotext.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 19:47:00 -0700, Graham Cooper wrote:
> > On Apr 26, 7:14 am, johannes falcone <visphatesj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think prolog could excel at this.
>
> >> Could you use an rdf triplestore instead of mysql as the database?
>
> >www.BlockProlog.comuses MySQL Database.
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 19:47:00 -0700, Graham Cooper wrote:
> > On Apr 26, 7:14 am, johannes falcone <visphatesj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think prolog could excel at this.
>
> >> Could you use an rdf triplestore instead of mysql as the database?
>
>
> > I have to increase VarChar to 255 to do any applications..
>
> > How are you going to compete against FriendFinder.com they do interest
> > matching compatibility already?
>
> > Herc
>
> So far as I can tell none have implemented any matching on *complementary* attributes.
>
> Dhu
>
> --
> Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco.
Right, you have to get around Negation As Failure...
> > I have to increase VarChar to 255 to do any applications..
>
> > How are you going to compete against FriendFinder.com they do interest
> > matching compatibility already?
>
> > Herc
>
> So far as I can tell none have implemented any matching on *complementary* attributes.
>
> Dhu
>
> --
> Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco.
I call this Categorical Negation.
color( X , not(red) ) :- color( X , blue ).
color( X , not(yellow) ) :- color( X , blue ).
...
into( M , not(knitting) ) :- into( M , football ).
Guys into football don't usually do knitting!
might be a Incompatible rule...
Herc
--
www.phpPROLOG.com (b)eta
0 new messages