Received: by 10.66.74.40 with SMTP id q8mr1588321pav.19.1344322715426;
        Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: p10ni2961910pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!ctu-gate!news.nctu.edu.tw!usenet.stanford.edu!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-15.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Robert Wessel <robertwess...@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.cobol
Subject: Re: Reserved Words
Message-ID: <nfsd189fcg2orbk58u4ebrmkv07diuu6ba@4ax.com>
References: <junk6c$rpg$1@speranza.aioe.org> <50377935-0551-4b49-971b-98c69c71e687@rq10g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <juoibr$ru1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <500fe56d$41$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net> <jupmsd$qqp$1@speranza.aioe.org> <65234227-61eb-43de-b3f2-e0301b7f7f76@f9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com> <a7bp70Fj5mU1@mid.individual.net> <1knu5nw.o1j3i8pvsvjoN%nospam@see.signature> <a7m1ueFdc9U1@mid.individual.net> <jv6qbv$5lo$1@dont-email.me> <jv6r13$9b1$1@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 30
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte Inc.  http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:50:08 -0500
X-Received-Bytes: 1934
Bytes: 2100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:32:22 -0400, Kerry Liles
<kerry.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 7/30/2012 4:20 PM, Qolin wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Pete Dashwood"  wrote in message news:a7m1ueFdc9U1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Now consider it from the point of view of the compiler writer.
>>> If there are NO reserved words how would you implement a language?
>>
>> ...Last I heard, Fortran had no reserved words, and it doesn't seem to
>> prevent a fair number of implementations.
>>
>
>No reserved words? It has been a long time since I used Fortran, but I 
>rather doubt:
>
>DO DO=1 TO 10
>
>would work would it?


Well,

  DO DO=1,10

would work, anyway.