HTML Purifier
1001 Webs
PHP.
HTML Purifier will not only remove all malicious code (better known as
XSS) with a thoroughly audited, secure yet permissive whitelist, it
will also make sure your documents are standards compliant, something
only achievable with a comprehensive knowledge of W3C's
specifications.
Tired of using BBCode due to the current landscape of deficient or
insecure HTML filters? Have a WYSIWYG editor but never been able to
use it? Looking for high-quality, standards-compliant, open-source
components for that application you're building?
HTML Purifier is for you!
And now, let's hear the Chorus:
"SPAM, OFF-TOPIC, SPAM, CROSSPOSTING, SPAM ¡¡¡, ..."
1001 Webs
> Are you related to this project in any way?
Nope.
> I'm actually using this in something I'm doing right now... I like the
> results, and not having to have anything installed on the server (like
> with Tidy) is nice. Curiously enough, my primary reason for using HTML
> Purifier is because I want my clients to be able to use a WYSIWYG editor
> for the content of their pages, without letting them mess up the valid HTML.
Thanks for the feedback.
> Still, you do sound like a salesman.
Because I copy&pasted from their website.
> Somebody asks about a product like
> this at least once a week -- better to lurk and wait to respond. :-P
Probably ...
edwar...@gmail.com
but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
lists.
Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
1001 Webs
> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> lists.
I thought there might be people interested in all those groups.
I read in the front page "Spread the Word!", but probably you're
right. I should have left out alt.html and
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html?
Sorry about that.
> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
Not at all.
Jerry Stuckle
He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
NOT doing you any favors.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstu...@attglobal.net
==================
RafaMinu
> edwardzy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> > but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> > lists.
>
> > Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>
> He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
> NOT doing you any favors.
... said Jerry the Scammer who flagrantly advertises himself as the
president of a non-existant Corporation, wanted by several government
agencies for delinquency activities and who unashamedly keeps several
scamming pages on the Internet ...
nu...@null.null
<jstu...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>edwar...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
>He's a known troll
In *your* opinion. Which, given your own history on usenet, is worth
precisely sweet FA
>and spammer.
Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
start calling them a spammer with exactly NO evidence save his own
idea that anyone not agreeing with him MUST be one. Remember, readers,
Google is your friend. LOL at Stuckle thinking his history doesn't
follow him!
>With his reputation around here, he is
>NOT doing you any favors.
I put his rep several points up the scale from your own.
Krustov
<>
<Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:11:48 GMT>
<um44p3dvrjih7f51g...@4ax.com>
> Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
> start calling them a spammer
>
Stuckle could start a argument in a empty room .
As a ex troll myself - i would have to say that stuckle seems to be
under the illusion that as long as he helps one or two users every now
and then - he is allowed to insult/abuse anybody he feels like .
But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
his sorry ass .
In a way - and if anything - then you should feel pity towards him as
apart from usenet he doesnt have anything else in life to value .
Neredbojias
Krustov scribed:
> But dont take my word for it - his record on comp.lang.php speaks for
> itself and if you do say anything towards or about him then the
> braindead stuckle lapdogs will instantly spring into action to defend
> his sorry ass .
I'm not going to frequent comp.lang.php just to find out, but do you have
any idea why this is so?
--
Neredbojias
Riches are their own reward.
Rik Wasmus
Hmm, Jerry can be pretty anoying at times. However, for some balanced
argument, your main beef with him is that you tend to advocate 'sub
optimal' (to put it delicately) code as well, making you easy prey.
This is however getting off-topic in all crossposted groups (some of which
my rather slim newsserver doesn't carry, which is why this is not a post
in all groups). Please feel free to continue this argument in alt.flame
--
Rik Wasmus
firew...@yahoo.com
<jstu...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>edwar...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
>He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
>NOT doing you any favors.
OK, just to ask about the topic, HTMLPurifier, I'm considering using
it in my scripts, and I'd like to hear what the experts here think
about it.
Ed
> edwar...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
>> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
>> lists.
>>
>> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>>
>
> He's a known troll and spammer. With his reputation around here, he is
> NOT doing you any favors.
>
Me, I don't know who/what is a troll or spammer or time-waster.
All I know is that there are a huge number of guys out on these groups
that are willing to take the time to examine the problems that we pose
and provide useful help. Good help can come from anyone.
And to them , I am well grateful.
Ed
Viper
Spammer 1001Webs just got your domain all kinds of attention.
Reported to ICANN for invalid WHOIS info since the email address listed
doesnt exist.
Reported to RFC-Ignorant.org for missing abuse email address and invalid
WHOIS info.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=htmlpurifier.org
You may thank the known spammer 1001Webs for this.
1001 Webs
> edwardzy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> > but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> > lists.
>
> > Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>
> Reported to ICANN for invalid WHOIS info since the email address listed
> doesnt exist.
> Reported to RFC-Ignorant.org for missing abuse email address and invalid
> You may thank the known spammer1001Websfor this.
Expect a boost in traffic from Viper's attention.
Last time he threatened us with "putting down" 1001webs.net we got an
unbelievable increase of visitors.
We thank you very much for that, Viper. We could have not device a
better way of promoting ourselves.
The site is of course running well and what's even better, it has
drawn the attention of several investors with whom we are now
negotiating possible business ventures.
Oh, by the way, ask your friend Jerry to also thank you for this:
Thank you for filing a complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint
Center (IC3).
Your complaint has been successfully submitted.
Please retain the following information for future contacts with the
IC3.
The IC3's mission is to serve as a vehicle to receive, develop, and
refer criminal complaints regarding the rapidly expanding arena of
cyber crime.
The IC3 aims to give the victims of cyber crime a convenient and easy-
to-use reporting mechanism.
nu...@null.null
And this is *precisely* the sort of behaviour that makes a normal
person wonder why Snakepiss gets messages of support in AWW...
Chaddy2222
n...@null.null wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:55:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstu...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >edwar...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> >> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> >> lists.
> >>
> >> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
> >>
> >
> >He's a known troll
>
> In *your* opinion. Which, given your own history on usenet, is worth
> precisely sweet FA
>
> >and spammer.
>
> Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
> start calling them a spammer with exactly NO evidence save his own
> idea that anyone not agreeing with him MUST be one. Remember, readers,
> Google is your friend. LOL at Stuckle thinking his history doesn't
> follow him!
>
Well I must admit that Jerry with some of his posts (especially in
more recent times) have made him look a bit of a dick head.
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesignonline.org
Chaddy2222
sicur...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> n...@null.null wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 07:55:10 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>
> > >edwardzy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >> I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> > >> but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> > >> lists.
>
> > >> Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>
> > >He's a known troll
>
> > In *your* opinion. Which, given your own history on usenet, is worth
> > precisely sweet FA
>
> > >and spammer.
>
> > Liar. As ever. Whenever Stuckle has a disagreement with someone, he'll
> > start calling them a spammer with exactly NO evidence save his own
> > idea that anyone not agreeing with him MUST be one. Remember, readers,
> > Google is your friend. LOL at Stuckle thinking his history doesn't
> > follow him!
>
> Well I must admit that Jerry with some of his posts (especially in
> more recent times) have made him look a bit of a dick head.
RafaMinu
> > I am the author, however. 1001 Webs, thank you for your enthusiasm,
> > but it's probably not a good idea to cross-post this on more than two
> > lists.
>
> > Hmm... perhaps there's too much marketing-speak on the front page? :-P
>
> Spammer 1001Webs just got your domain all kinds of attention.
> Reported to ICANN for invalid WHOIS info since the email address listed
> doesnt exist.
> Reported to RFC-Ignorant.org for missing abuse email address and invalid
> You may thank the known spammer 1001Webs for this.
I start to get the feeling that both Viper The Libeller and Jerry The
Scammer are one and the same person.
I also suspect that he is behind all those SPAM (and other) attacks
that my websites are suffering (and those of others that have
disagreed with him in the past).
Which leads me to think that he suffers from some kind of Sexual
Impotence, since most of those SPAM messages are Viagra-related.
Hummmm ...
Maybe that's why he beats up his wife ...
The bloody WANKER ...
Viper
> I start to get the feeling that both Viper The Libeller and Jerry The
> Scammer are one and the same person.
> I also suspect that he is behind all those SPAM (and other) attacks
> that my websites are suffering (and those of others that have
> disagreed with him in the past).
> Which leads me to think that he suffers from some kind of Sexual
> Impotence, since most of those SPAM messages are Viagra-related.
> Hummmm ...
> Maybe that's why he beats up his wife ...
> The bloody WANKER ...
role: Administradores Telefonica de Espana
address: Ronda de la Comunicación s/n
address: Edificio Norte 1, planta 6ª
address: 28050 Madrid
address: SPAIN
org: ORG-TDE1-RIPE
You are from a third world country. Your opinion means nothing. Good bye.
Viper
>
> Expect a boost in traffic from Viper's attention.
> Last time he threatened us with "putting down" 1001webs.net we got an
> unbelievable increase of visitors.
> We thank you very much for that, Viper. We could have not device a
> better way of promoting ourselves.
> The site is of course running well and what's even better, it has
> drawn the attention of several investors with whom we are now
> negotiating possible business ventures.
>
affiliate links and no original content.
Sp stop the lies spam monkey.
> Oh, by the way, ask your friend Jerry to also thank you for this:
>
> Thank you for filing a complaint with the Internet Crime Complaint
> Center (IC3).
>
LMAO what did you report? Your own spamming? Your shitty web page design
that looks like it was done by a 3yr old?
Jerry Stuckle
I wouldn't say that Spain is a third-world country. But I agree that
his opinion means nothing.
edwar...@gmail.com
So, if I've got things straight, I now need to clear up blacklist
issues with these areas:
* Reported to ICANN for invalid WHOIS info since the email address
listed
doesnt exist.
* Reported to RFC-Ignorant.org for missing abuse email address and
invalid
WHOIS info.
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=htmlpurifier.org
* IC3
I'm on shared hosting, so I don't know very much about WHOIS/MX
management. I do know my registrar cloaks my data, but I was under the
impression this is a very common process... and the proxy address does
work (I just tested it...)
Jerry Stuckle
Private registration is possible, and not uncommon. As long as the
proxy address works, you should be OK.
nu...@null.null
<jstu...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>edwar...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Is *this* why I got a spike of traffic three days back?
>>
>> So, if I've got things straight, I now need to clear up blacklist
>> issues with these areas:
>>
>> * Reported to ICANN for invalid WHOIS info since the email address
>> listed
>> doesnt exist.
>> * Reported to RFC-Ignorant.org for missing abuse email address and
>> invalid
>> WHOIS info.
>> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=htmlpurifier.org
>> * IC3
>>
>> I'm on shared hosting, so I don't know very much about WHOIS/MX
>> management. I do know my registrar cloaks my data, but I was under the
>> impression this is a very common process... and the proxy address does
>> work (I just tested it...)
>>
>
>Private registration is possible, and not uncommon. As long as the
>proxy address works, you should be OK.
So, what, now you're saying that Snakepiss *shouldn't* have reported
this domain? Well no, of course not, you'd never say that, would you?
After all, when there's two people as unpopular as you and Viper, it
stands to reason you'll back each other up!
RafaMinu
Good one Viper, you've just discovered the address of Telefonica,
Spain's main ISP:
http://www.telefonica.es/acercadetelefonica/eng/0magnitudes/mercados.shtml
As it happens, Telefónica operates also in the United States.
Locations include, Miami & Boca Raton FL, New York, NY, San Diego CA,
Washington D.C, Atlanta GA, and Houston, TX.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telefónica#United_States
Have a look at the 3rd world company ratings:
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2007/snapshots/8221.html
What a bloody idiot you are Jerry, I mean Viper ...
RafaMinu
Actually I reported SCAM and FRAUD, Jerry, I mean Viper ..
I will also forward your opinions to 7Dana, the company behind the
design.
RafaMinu
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:23 -0500, Jerry Stuckle
>
>
>
There are more "coincidences".
Both accuse other posters of SPAMMING whenever they disagree with
their opinions.
And both think Usenet is theirs and can make the rules for others to
obey.
Ah, and both are real WANKERS.
Viper
Didnt work when I tried it. If it had I wouldnt have reported it.
Viper
> Good one Viper, you've just discovered the address of Telefonica,
> Spain's main ISP:
Main sewer is more like it.
#8 on the top spammers list
http://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?asn=3352
Provider has 7976960 total IP's
22269 (0.279 %) listed at level 1
15954 at level 3
nu...@null.null
Is that as close as Snakepiss gets to an apology? Still, at least he's
better at it than his sidekick Stuckle, eh?
nu...@null.null
Great, thanks for the info. I'll sign up with them and send you a few
adverts :o)
Ambush Commander
> > I'm on shared hosting, so I don't know very much about WHOIS/MX
> > management. I do know my registrar cloaks my data, but I was under the
> > impression this is a very common process... and the proxy address does
> > work (I just tested it...)
>
> Didnt work when I tried it. If it had I wouldnt have reported it.
Did you fully complete the handshake? Also, we're talking about
htmlpuri...@proxy.dreamhost.com, correct? I kindly ask that you
try one more time.
Viper
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
htmlpuri...@proxy.dreamhost.com
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:<htmlpuri...@proxy.dreamhost.com>:
host mx1.balanced.looney.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.14]:
550 <htmlpuri...@proxy.dreamhost.com>: Recipient address rejected:
User unknown in virtual alias table
RafaMinu
> RafaMinu wrote:
> > Good one Viper, you've just discovered the address of Telefonica,
> > Spain's main ISP:
>
> Main sewer is more like it.
>
> Provider has 7976960 total IP's
> 22269 (0.279 %) listed at level 1
> 15954 at level 3
Great link Viper.
Thanks.
... but you are still a WANKER.
RafaMinu
So now, the right thing to do is apologize for your mistake, right?
In fact, you should hang yourself ...
Viper
No mistake, the email bounces as no such user. So it is invalid.
Ambush Commander
> No mistake, the email bounces as no such user. So it is invalid.
I'm still not seeing it, although when I purposely feed the SMTP
server with bad data it gives me an identical error message. There
might have been temporary configuration problems; did you try again,
or is that the original error message?
Viper
Nope I tried again...