Keith Keller: Hypocrite
R3e4al5to 23ar3ga4rino
people have complained about a rash of people including PGP headers
in the bodies of their posts. It's like a little club. It annoys
the hell out of people, but they won't stop iti and they won't bury
the stuff in their headers. Here is what the hypocrite Keller
posted in alt.os.linux.slackware:
Keith Keller <kkeller...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> trolled:
> The PGP signature of the body (actually, body + some headers) can
> be put into the headers (that's what I do), but as I've said many
> times in this very newsgroup, it's not worth the effort. Most
> popular nntp clients also support hiding PGP information that's
This is totally false.
> part of the body, so there's really no reason to go through the
> effort of putting the signature in the headers, at least in this
> group where (it seems) only a few trolls whinge about it. (YMMV
> in other groups; comp.lang.perl.misc really hated my PGP sig in
> the body, and it wasn't just trolls and lamers complaining,
> either.)
It appears that Mr. Keller wants to kiss the asses of those in
comp.lang.perl.misc but he is perfectly willing to shit all over
those in alt.os.linux.slackware.
Note that the hypocrite actually buries his PGP in his headers in
a.o.l.s. but he advises other posters not to do so.
> In short, it depends on your audience, but there's no technical
> advantage to moving the headers out of the body.
Yes, it depends on your audience. You kiss the asses of some, where
you need their knowledge, while you annoy others because a few of
your friends also wish to annoy posters in a.o.l.s.
Keith Keller is a coward, a troll, and a hypocrite.
cordially, as always,
rm
Leonard The Committed
Get out of your parents basement and go someplace to experience life.
Niki Kovacs
> You REALLY need a blowjob, don't you?
>
> Get out of your parents basement and go someplace to experience life.
I know it's a bad habit to feed trolls, but I know how you feel. I go to a
vietnamese martial arts club twice a week, and I guess it would be a good
thing for people like RM to go there just to ventilate their anger. An hour
of punching and kicking in a sandbag, and you're the most serene person on
earth. But I know this is totally vain. He'll invariably lift one of his
rear legs on the trunk of this post.
Cheers,
NK
--
I'm not as think as you stoned I am.
Matt Garrish
"R3e4al5to 23ar3ga4rino" <1...@b3i4t5eme.org> wrote in message
news:SaTFf.12144$1e5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...
>
> It appears that Mr. Keller wants to kiss the asses of those in
> comp.lang.perl.misc but he is perfectly willing to shit all over
> those in alt.os.linux.slackware.
>
I like his priorities!
Is that what you were asking?
Matt
HJohnson
> This is about the hypocrite known as Keith Keller. A number of
> people have complained about a rash of people including PGP headers
> in the bodies of their posts.
The only one that seems annoyed, is you. Live with it!
> It's like a little club. It annoys
> the hell out of people, but they won't stop iti and they won't bury
> the stuff in their headers. Here is what the hypocrite Keller
> posted in alt.os.linux.slackware:
>
> Keith Keller <kkeller...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> trolled:
>
>> The PGP signature of the body (actually, body + some headers) can
>> be put into the headers (that's what I do), but as I've said many
>> times in this very newsgroup, it's not worth the effort. Most
>> popular nntp clients also support hiding PGP information that's
>
> - - - - - < snip > - - - -
--
humjohn AT aerosurf DOT net
A Guy Called Tyketto
Hash: SHA1
Niki is right. Really bad to feed a troll. But once again, in
for a sheep.
In alt.os.linux.slackware R3e4al5to 23ar3ga4rino <1...@b3i4t5eme.org> wrote:
> This is about the hypocrite known as Keith Keller. A number of
> people have complained about a rash of people including PGP headers
> in the bodies of their posts. It's like a little club. It annoys
> the hell out of people, but they won't stop iti and they won't bury
> the stuff in their headers. Here is what the hypocrite Keller
> posted in alt.os.linux.slackware:
So now you don't like what Keith says, because it doesn't meld
with what you're trying to brainwash everyone into doing. wah wah. Get
over it.
>> The PGP signature of the body (actually, body + some headers) can
>> be put into the headers (that's what I do), but as I've said many
>> times in this very newsgroup, it's not worth the effort. Most
>> popular nntp clients also support hiding PGP information that's
>
> This is totally false.
then back up your claim with facts. Show us how to do it with
your (outdated) newsreader. Oh, wait. I forgot.. you're the 'pgp trash
troll delete' guy.
>> part of the body, so there's really no reason to go through the
>> effort of putting the signature in the headers, at least in this
>> group where (it seems) only a few trolls whinge about it. (YMMV
>> in other groups; comp.lang.perl.misc really hated my PGP sig in
>> the body, and it wasn't just trolls and lamers complaining,
>> either.)
>
> It appears that Mr. Keller wants to kiss the asses of those in
> comp.lang.perl.misc but he is perfectly willing to shit all over
> those in alt.os.linux.slackware.
And you don't do the same to AOLS? It's only you that has been
whining about this all these years. Sounds like someone needs to go
outside and play.
> Note that the hypocrite actually buries his PGP in his headers in
> a.o.l.s. but he advises other posters not to do so.
wah wah.
> Keith Keller is a coward, a troll, and a hypocrite.
And you can't even come up with new insults to fling at people.
Rather droll.
BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyk...@sbcglobal.net
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyk...@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD6OqXyBkZmuMZ8L8RAkVmAKDC/VewCjWP49HfM06XNF9WGrTE4QCgqvm4
6feFk5gWkNQYPHMm/Bc7gko=
=p5/I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Realto Margarino
> R3e4al5to 23ar3ga4rino wrote:
> > This is about the hypocrite known as Keith Keller. A number of
> > people have complained about a rash of people including PGP
> > headers in the bodies of their posts.
> The only one that seems annoyed, is you. Live with it!
Nonsense. I am certainly the most vociferous in opposition.
Others, such as yourself, are cowered.
> > It's like a little club. It annoys the hell out of people, but
> > they won't stop iti and they won't bury the stuff in their
> > headers. Here is what the hypocrite Keller posted in
> > alt.os.linux.slackware:
> >
> > Keith Keller <kkeller...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> trolled:
> >
> >> The PGP signature of the body (actually, body + some headers) can
> >> be put into the headers (that's what I do), but as I've said many
> >> times in this very newsgroup, it's not worth the effort. Most
> >> popular nntp clients also support hiding PGP information that's
> >
> > - - - - - < snip > - - - -
Why the snip?
cordially, as always,
rm
e3a4l5to a2r3g4a5r5ino
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
Instead of calling me names, why don't you just tell us why you
won't put your pgp into your headers?
Or do you find name-calling more helpful?
cordially, as always,
rm
Realto Margarino
> On 2006-02-07, A Guy Called Tyketto <tyk...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > Niki is right. Really bad to feed a troll.
> It is a lot worse to feed a troll in two different newsgroups. If
> you must feed Roger, please check the Newsgroups: line!
> comp.lang.perl.misc shouldn't have to endure the crap aols has had
> to deal with. (I was wondering why clpmisc regulars were posting
> here!)
Why shouldn't they know that you are a hypocrit? They have good
reason not to include PGP in their messages, and you pretend to
agree with them, while also pretending to agree with the crowd in
a.o.l.s. And you don't want the perl people to know that you are a
two faced little phoney.
You take out your PGP to kiss the perlies asses. But you champion
the inclusion of PGP in the slackware group to kiss their asses.
And then you call me a "troll" as if that somehow deals with the
issue. But this is old stuff. Anyone that disagrees with a vocal
minority in this group is called a "troll."
You're pathetic. If you think it is a good idea to include PGP then
admit it and include it. If you don't think it is a good idea, then
don't include it, and admit that.
cordially, as always,
rm
Realto Margarino
> On 2006-02-07, A Guy Called Tyketto <tyk...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
> >
> It is a lot worse to feed a troll in two different newsgroups. If you
> must feed Roger, please check the Newsgroups: line! comp.lang.perl.misc
> shouldn't have to endure the crap aols has had to deal with. (I was
> wondering why clpmisc regulars were posting here!)
The hypocrite is scared that the comp.lang.perl.misc people will see
what a phoney, two-faced, little weasel this Keller fellow really
is. His "opinion" is purely shaped by the opinion of who he
believes to be "in charge."
cordially, as always,
rm
Realto Margarino
[ From: Keith Keller <kkeller...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> ]
[ Subject: Re: Keith Keller: Hypocrite ]
[ Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.slackware ]
[ Message-ID: <pc8nb3x...@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> ]
On 2006-02-07, A Guy Called Tyketto <tyk...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
>
> Niki is right. Really bad to feed a troll.
It is a lot worse to feed a troll in two different newsgroups. If you
must feed Roger, please check the Newsgroups: line! comp.lang.perl.misc
shouldn't have to endure the crap aols has had to deal with. (I was
wondering why clpmisc regulars were posting here!)
--keith
--
kkeller...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
see X- headers for PGP signature information
--
How come so many stat fans, and pseudo stat fans, are Jewish?
Realto Margarino
[ Subject: Re: Keith Keller: Hypocrite ]
[ Message-ID: <sI7Gf.16161$1e5.4...@news20.bellglobal.com> ]
cordially, as always,
rm
--
Dan C
>> The only one that seems annoyed, is you. Live with it!
> Nonsense. I am certainly the most vociferous in opposition.
> Others, such as yourself, are cowered.
Wrong. You're the only one complaining. Can you provide a name or
message ID of someone else whining about it?
Didn't think so. Go to your room, Wanda.
--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
Dan C
> is. His "opinion" is purely shaped by the opinion of who he
> believes to be "in charge."
Which is why *your* opinion is completely ignored. You don't count for
shit. You're a nobody, and a buffoon.
When we want some shit from you, we'll give your head a squeeze.
A Guy Called Tyketto
Hash: SHA1
In alt.os.linux.slackware e3a4l5to a2r3g4a5r5ino <r3...@b4i5te5me.org> wrote:
> In alt.os.linux.slackware A Guy Called Tyketto <tyk...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>
> Instead of calling me names, why don't you just tell us why you
> won't put your pgp into your headers?
Simple. I don't want, nor need to. Either way, you're not going
to stop me from doing what I want. PGP goes around the body of the
message, as it's a digital signature. Don't like it, read the RFC,
scream, cry, throw your temper tantrum, throw your bowl of Corn Flakes
on the floor, and stand in the corner like the bad little boy you are.
> Or do you find name-calling more helpful?
I find it funny. I find you funny. Actually, I find you a
troll.
BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyk...@sbcglobal.net
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyk...@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD6SAKyBkZmuMZ8L8RAjiUAJ9amJSo4YWadjhNPt8awUu/ZPaf1gCePHaG
AX7DdbdAnmMxB+NpFikweOY=
=kce8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Tad McClellan
[ Followups set ]
R3e4al5to 23ar3ga4rino <1...@b3i4t5eme.org> wrote:
> Keith Keller is a coward
That is rich coming from an anonymous poster.
Use your name if you expect a thinking person to take you seriously.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
ta...@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
+Alan Hicks+
Hash: SHA1
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.os.linux.slackware.]
In alt.os.linux.slackware, A Guy Called Tyketto dared to utter,
> I find it funny. I find you funny. Actually, I find you a
> troll.
I know the posters of AOLS are plenty smart enough to know by now that
arguing with RM isn't going to get anyone anywhere. RM is quite
obviously a very distrubed individual. He doesn't deserve anyone's
hatred or animosity. He deserves your pity if anything. Please quitely
put him in your kill file or ignore him some other way, and move along.
No action you take is going to help him. By lowering yourself to his
level, you're only rubbing shit in your own face.
- --
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD6UKez8zcalmVmBkRAtv6AJ9MEs5TXkcGYyin95fB3vf53LECSwCeJkgz
TI/Pg53/B34OiUgwv5alGJk=
=KsbC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Realto Margarino
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:24:10 +0000, Realto Margarino wrote:
> > Nonsense. I am certainly the most vociferous in opposition.
> > Others, such as yourself, are cowered.
> Wrong. You're the only one complaining. Can you provide a name
> or message ID of someone else whining about it?
Sure. But not to the likes of a troll like you. Most people in
comp.lang.perl.misc complained about it. I fail to see why the
slackware people would be any different.
cordially, as always,
rm
LiNuCe
<youmust...@invalid.lan> :
> On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:24:10 +0000, Realto Margarino wrote:
>
> >> The only one that seems annoyed, is you. Live with it!
>
> > Nonsense. I am certainly the most vociferous in opposition.
> > Others, such as yourself, are cowered.
>
> Wrong. You're the only one complaining. Can you provide a name or
> message ID of someone else whining about it?
>
> Didn't think so. Go to your room, Wanda.
1) As it is possible to put the signature in a attachment to please
everyone, 2) As doing so works with *EVERY* newsreader, 3) As there
is no *GOOD* technical reason to put the GPG signature in plain text
in the message, Candide would say that if everyone puts some good
will and try to be wise to put his/her GPG signature in attachment,
everything is perfect in the most perfect world.
RRe45a6o M345a345o
[trolling deleted]
If we want any from you, we'll give your head a squeeze.
cordially, as always,
rm
R4e5a65lto 2M3a4r4g56arino
> Simple. I don't want, nor need to. Either way, you're not going
> to stop me from doing what I want.
Tough guy. Nobody tells you what to do.
> PGP goes around the body of the message, as it's a digital
> signature.
So?
> Don't like it, read the RFC, scream, cry, throw your temper
> tantrum, throw your bowl of Corn Flakes on the floor, and stand in
> the corner like the bad little boy you are.
The RFC states that the signature limit is 4 lines. And it doesn't
say anything about calling me any names.
How does calling me names justify including PGP in the body of your
message?
cordially, as always,
rm
Realto Margarino
> [ Followups set ]
> R3e4al5to 23ar3ga4rino <1...@b3i4t5eme.org> wrote:
> > Keith Keller is a coward
> That is rich coming from an anonymous poster.
> Use your name if you expect a thinking person to take you seriously.
Sure. My name is Roger Maynard. dran...@hotmail.com.
Everybody in the slackware group knows my name. But I forgot that
none of you do.
cordially, as always,
rm
Realto Margarino
pgp trash troll delete
> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.os.linux.slackware.]
This has been corrected.
> I know the posters of AOLS are plenty smart enough to know by now that
> arguing with RM isn't going to get anyone anywhere. RM is quite
> obviously a very distrubed individual. He doesn't deserve anyone's
> hatred or animosity. He deserves your pity if anything.
Right. You're the biggest troll, and well-known as the biggest
asshole, that posts to this ng. In fact, even you have admitted,
numerous times, that you are this ng's "most hated regulars."
Your inclusion of PGP is a pathetically childish affectation. It is
silly. Nothing you have ever posted to this group required
authentication of any sort.
cordially, as always,
rm
Dan C
>> Wrong. You're the only one complaining. Can you provide a name or
>> message ID of someone else whining about it?
> 1) As it is possible to put the signature in a attachment to please
> everyone, 2) As doing so works with *EVERY* newsreader, 3) As there
> is no *GOOD* technical reason to put the GPG signature in plain text
> in the message, Candide would say that if everyone puts some good
> will and try to be wise to put his/her GPG signature in attachment,
> everything is perfect in the most perfect world.
This isn't a perfect world.
The problem with that is that attachments don't fly in text newsgroups.
Re2345alto Ma2222rgarino
If we want any shit out of you, we'll give your head a squeeze.
cordially, as always,
rm