Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

turbo pascal on XP

2 views
Skip to first unread message

dkspu...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 19, 2008, 12:46:54 PM1/19/08
to
Is anyone running Turbo Pascal ver 1.5 on XP? I can't get the
debugger to run - error message refers to 16 bit driver and pointing
device. Any suggestions?

n...@thankyou.com

unread,
Jan 19, 2008, 1:21:00 PM1/19/08
to

I havn't used Turbo Pascal in many years. Now I write all my code in
FreePascal and have not had any problems with it.

-Dev

Marco van de Voort

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 9:15:51 AM1/20/08
to

If running in win98 mode doesn't help (right mouse on the .exe and then
properties and searching for compat mode settings), maybe it is time to
migrate to something more recent than over 15 years old:-)

winston19842005

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 10:56:48 AM1/20/08
to


On 1/19/08 12:46 PM, in article
39ba11bc-507b-479c...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com,
"dkspu...@gmail.com" <dkspu...@gmail.com> wrote:

Besides the "migrate to newer product" suggestions (hey, I use UCSD Pascal
IV.0), I'd suggest downloading a copy of "dosbox", and running it under
there.

At least until you get it developed, then you can try moving the executable
to XP. Try it with something simple first. But at least this should get your
debugger running.

Good luck!

Marco van de Voort

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 12:10:06 PM1/20/08
to

TP 1.5 is afaik a Windows (3.x) version.

winston19842005

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 1:20:45 PM1/20/08
to


On 1/20/08 12:10 PM, in article slrnfp703e....@snail.stack.nl,

Posts on the Dosbox forum (http://vogons.zetafleet.com/viewtopic.php?t=9405)
seem to indicate it is capable of Windows 3.x

Marco van de Voort

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 2:31:57 PM1/20/08
to
On 2008-01-20, Marco van de Voort <mar...@stack.nl> wrote:
>> At least until you get it developed, then you can try moving the executable
>> to XP. Try it with something simple first. But at least this should get your
>> debugger running.
>
> TP 1.5 is afaik a Windows (3.x) version.

I know that, but that will require an additional win3.x license.

winston19842005

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 3:09:33 PM1/20/08
to


On 1/20/08 2:31 PM, in article slrnfp78dd....@snail.stack.nl, "Marco

Well, if the OP is running this under Win 3.x, then why could the OP not
install it under DOSBox. You wouldn't need an additional license for the
same box?

Anyway, I did NOT realize TP 1.5 was a Windows version, nor would I think
installing Win 3.x under DOSBox would be an easy task, since it isn't a real
DOS. Maybe I'm wrong.

Marco van de Voort

unread,
Jan 20, 2008, 3:30:30 PM1/20/08
to
On 2008-01-20, winston19842005 <bjjl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> TP 1.5 is afaik a Windows (3.x) version.
>>
>> I know that, but that will require an additional win3.x license.
>
> Well, if the OP is running this under Win 3.x, then why could the OP not
> install it under DOSBox.

If he is yes. He might be running it under w9x. And personally I think that
chance is higher.

> You wouldn't need an additional license for the
> same box?

And I wouldn't even bet on that.

Message has been deleted

Marco van de Voort

unread,
Oct 10, 2008, 3:48:58 AM10/10/08
to
On 2008-10-10, John H Guillory <jo...@communicomm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> TP 1.5 is afaik a Windows (3.x) version.
>>
>>I know that, but that will require an additional win3.x license.
> TPW (Turbo Pascal For Windows) is a Windows 3.x compiler, Turbo Pascal
> 1.5 (TP1.5) is a MS-DOS compiler for making .com files....

Possibly (do you have a reference for that?), but that one, if it exists
never comes up here.

Moreover, the OP mentioned 16-bit driver and "pointing device" problems, so
I doubt it is really a that old version.

GMorris

unread,
Nov 25, 2008, 3:49:29 PM11/25/08
to
Don't want any "top-posting-whining" so I
deleted the rest. Anyway, take a look at
www.retrosoftware.com for a good laugh!
They're offering TP 1.5 for the mere price
of $99US, and they have TP 7 as well if
you're up for a bargain. It's only $149US!

Man, that sounds like the business I'd like
to have, and I seriously wonder in these
times of easily found torrents and such why
or even IF people actually pay for that.

Oh, and did anyone else notice that, even
with Delphi, Pascal seems to be like Latin
nowadays. Seems to be dying, and I only
see like a dozen posts in the last couple of
months even here...

Strange.

Marco van de Voort

unread,
Nov 25, 2008, 5:04:50 PM11/25/08
to
On 2008-11-25, GMorris <gwmor...@hotpop.com> wrote:
> Don't want any "top-posting-whining" so I
> deleted the rest. Anyway, take a look at
> www.retrosoftware.com for a good laugh!
> They're offering TP 1.5 for the mere price
> of $99US, and they have TP 7 as well if
> you're up for a bargain. It's only $149US!
>
> Man, that sounds like the business I'd like
> to have, and I seriously wonder in these
> times of easily found torrents and such why
> or even IF people actually pay for that.

It's usually for business use that want to be license compliant, not for
students. Typically they are also full licenses, not educational versions.

> Oh, and did anyone else notice that, even
> with Delphi, Pascal seems to be like Latin
> nowadays. Seems to be dying, and I only
> see like a dozen posts in the last couple of
> months even here...

Or they moved to other forms of communication of course.

CBFalconer

unread,
Nov 25, 2008, 9:22:06 PM11/25/08
to
GMorris wrote:
>
> Don't want any "top-posting-whining" so I
> deleted the rest. Anyway, take a look at
> www.retrosoftware.com for a good laugh!
> They're offering TP 1.5 for the mere price
> of $99US, and they have TP 7 as well if
> you're up for a bargain. It's only $149US!

Useless.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

0 new messages