Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
M for Palm?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
M-a-S  
View profile  
 More options Mar 7 2003, 8:00 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.mumps
From: "M-a-S" <d001120t0...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:40:27 GMT
Local: Fri, Mar 7 2003 7:40 pm
Subject: M for Palm?
Is there such a guy?
Technically, it must be quite simple, since there are a few
implementations for PC with the source code, and the size
of M would fit Palm perfectly. But I never seem to see M
for Palm. Or would it be absolutely useless?
M-a-S

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Fraser  
View profile  
 More options Mar 8 2003, 11:49 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.mumps
From: "John Fraser" <vze4c...@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:49:14 GMT
Local: Sat, Mar 8 2003 11:49 am
Subject: Re: M for Palm?
Granted that I'm new here, but...

I think it would be a very power combination.  Most database vendors today
provider a "lite" version to allow data synchronization from the desktop to
the mobile device.  If M is as powerful as I'm beginning to understand, it
is a perfect place for it.  It was originally designed to run on constrained
hardware, making it ideal for mobile and embedded systems programming.  The
big database vendors mobile databases are still bulky and slow.

I was looking at FreeM, and whatever the one at Mumps.org is called, for
this reason.  FreeM looks like it would be easier to port, from my initial
look anyway.

Cheers,

John

"M-a-S" <d001120t0...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:%Zaaa.92397$Se4.8476208@twister.southeast.rr.com...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
paul perrin  
View profile  
 More options Mar 11 2003, 7:32 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.mumps
From: "paul perrin" <pperrin_n...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:31:18 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Mar 11 2003 7:31 pm
Subject: Re: M for Palm?
I have used 'HanDBase' on the palm, which syncronises with a HanDBase
desktop application that is ODBC compliant. Really the database engine is
pretty irrelevant - data entry/reporting is plenty fast enough and the
desktop drivers allow integration with everything (ODBC permitting) - and I
am not even suggesting that HanDBase is the best of the Palm databases.

The Psion range of organisers always had programability as a big selling
feature, but in practice it just seemed to reduced their rate of decline.

Realistically, for many, many people their handheld is primarily a
detachable interface to MS Outlook - If your app is brilliant, you will
interface with whatever the handheld supports - you will not demand that the
handheld loads an alien OS too.

In practice, for M to 'break out' it would have to layer its functionality
on to recent existing technologies rather than try to drag its own onto the
latest hardware. M(ish) to manipulate an XML document object model would be
good - at no cost to anyone. Also, (a la ADSI) going on to provide standard
interface (for M XML, accessible to an M XMLdom) to access everything that
anyone might ever want to program from the one source would bring the
technology to the language rather then demanding that the langauge
constantly evolves to incorporate every latest fashion.

Hey this sounds like a job for user definable ssvns!! :-))

Paul /)/+)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »