The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: rif <r...@mit.edu>
Date: 08 Mar 2004 12:52:37 -0500
Local: Mon, Mar 8 2004 12:52 pm
Subject: Re: off-topic: open challenge to Christian Lynbeck
Raymond Toy <r...@earthlink.net> writes: Well, I'm not sure it's about ftruncate per se. Maybe it's about > rif wrote: > > generation. It's worthwhile to know the specifics of your > > implementation (for instance, it seems that a substantial amount of > > the last-mile speed up for this benchmark on CMUCL came from figuring > > out ftruncate could be fast inside a macro, but not inside an inline > > function). > I don't believe that is true. I think if you take Brian's macro and > Well, at least that was true for me on the particular version of cmucl > Ray maximum inlining depth, or something else. If I take Brian's CL version, and I replace his macro with an inline function, I get a float to pointer coercion on the return value of the inline function, and the program slows way down. This is using the 2003-09-10 build of CMUCL. rif You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||