Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion special forms.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Erik Naggum  
View profile  
 More options Jul 17 2001, 7:55 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Erik Naggum <e...@naggum.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:55:53 GMT
Local: Tues, Jul 17 2001 7:55 am
Subject: Re: special forms.
* Frode Vatvedt Fjeld <fro...@acm.org>

> You are right that strictly functionally speaking, special forms are
> not necessary.

  Not so.  Take let as the favorite example of a special form that is very
  necessary in any functional paradigm.  What may be true for if is not
  true for forms that in addition to require special evaluation rules of
  subforms, imposes _structure_ on its subforms that "violate" the normal
  evaluation rules.  In fact, if is a very special case special operator.
  It is better to begin with something like let and then deduce if, than to
  begin with if and try to get anywhere at all.

#:Erik
--
  Travel is a meat thing.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.