Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion speed of let vs. let*

Received: by 10.68.241.98 with SMTP id wh2mr6893807pbc.7.1337192821053;
        Wed, 16 May 2012 11:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: pr3ni6129pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mike <mi...@mac.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: speed of let vs. let*
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <jp0rhk$hui$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:27:00 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2JyBdfwN7NBeN0ADNAB4yw";
	logging-data="18386"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+D/kCSr05F8MxvpRcI089s"
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Asduzl+kaKhglvqDbvBROKZ+DZo=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I understand that the order of variables set in let is implementation
dependent and the order of variables in let* proceeds from the first
varable to the last. It seems that for my (simple) projects that I can
get a lot of the defun's work done in the let* initialization part if
I use let*.

Is let faster than let* since let does not have to be concerned with
initialization order?

Mike