Message from discussion
Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!junk.nocrew.ORG!not-for-mail
From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars.s...@nocrew.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Name for the set of characters legal in identifiers
Date: 14 Jan 2004 13:45:54 +0100
Organization: nocrew
Lines: 11
Sender: l...@junk.nocrew.org
Message-ID: <85d69m1ywt.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
References: <4004c6e2.127807819@news.eircom.net> <3283047574505462KL2065E@naggum.no> <4004f268.138951618@news.eircom.net> <3283057362064279KL2065E@naggum.no> <400527b7.152600479@news.eircom.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: junk.nocrew.org (213.242.147.30)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1074084624 14021919 213.242.147.30 ([140306])
X-Orig-Path: junk.nocrew.org!not-for-mail
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
wallacethinmi...@eircom.net (Russell Wallace) writes:
> I was making heavy use of a concept I didn't have a name for, which
> rather bugged me; Lisp is one of the very few languages which allow
> non-alphanumeric characters in symbols
So does Forth, so perhaps programmers using that language have a name
for it.
--
Lars Brinkhoff, Services for Unix, Linux, GCC, HTTP
Brinkhoff Consulting http://www.brinkhoff.se/