Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Are we close to a Lisp boom ?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ken Tilton  
View profile  
 More options May 3 2008, 11:57 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Ken Tilton <kennytil...@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 23:57:05 -0400
Local: Sat, May 3 2008 11:57 pm
Subject: Re: Are we close to a Lisp boom ?

vanekl wrote:
> Spiros Bousbouras wrote:

>> If it's true that as we progress in time, successive
>> fashionable languages resemble Lisp more and
>> more then Lisp's turn should come at some point.

>> Do you agree with this argument ? If yes, would
>> you say we're close to a Lisp boom ?

> IMO, not until CL goes through another standardization process,
> not for the language this time, but for a few libraries:
> comm, stream, unicode, thread.

Yeah, the damn thing is unusable as it is.

> Too bad there isn't a benevolent angel that could fund such
> an expenditure <hint>PG</hint>.

Nah, he went broke trying to do a start-up with CL, a Web store I think.

kt

--
http://smuglispweeny.blogspot.com/
http://www.theoryyalgebra.com/
ECLM rant:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1331906677993764413&hl=en
ECLM talk:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9173722505157942928&q=&hl=en


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.