Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Recommendations of other types of Lisp
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Xah Lee  
View profile  
 More options Dec 23 2011, 12:45 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Dec 23 2011 12:45 am
Subject: Re: Recommendations of other types of Lisp
On Dec 22, 1:41 pm, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On 22.12.2011 17:31, Xah Lee wrote:

> > I would recommend:

> > * Clojure
> > * NewLisp

> > the first runs on Java machine and is widely popular, more widely used
> > in industry than your typical Common Lisp or Scheme Lisp.

> Where did you find out the numbers?  Just from gut feeling I would have
> said that Common Lisp would be more widespread than Clojure since it's
> older.  I did hear a lot about Clojure recently but whether that
> translates to usage I can't tell.

I heard it from the Clojure Propaganda Machine. My dog ate the proof.

 Xah


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.