Message from discussion Discussion of Lisp implementations?
From: Barry Margolin <bar...@bbnplanet.com>
Subject: Re: Discussion of Lisp implementations?
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Organization: GTE Internetworking, Cambridge, MA
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 20:47:47 GMT
Originator: bar...@bbnplanet.com (Barry Margolin)
In article <w4or9qrju8t....@nemesis.irtnog.org>,
His Holiness the Reverend Doktor Xenophon Fenderson, the Carbon(d)ated <xenop...@irtnog.org> wrote:
>A lot of the traffic on this newsgroup centers around ANSI Common
>Lisp, that is, interpreting the language specification, or how to go
>about using the language. Would it be on-topic to ask questions about
>how Common Lisp could be implemented?
Practically anything about Lisp is on-topic. There are a few specific
areas where there are more appropriate groups (e.g. you'll get better
answers about Emacs Lisp in the Emacs newsgroups, and about Autolisp in the
CAD newsgroup), but just about everything else is fine here.
Barry Margolin, bar...@bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.