Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion web application framework
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Adrian Kubala  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7 2003, 6:15 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Adrian Kubala <adr...@sixfingeredman.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:46:29 -0600
Local: Fri, Nov 7 2003 5:46 pm
Subject: Re: web application framework
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Ray Dillinger wrote:
> Marco Antoniotti wrote:
> > Adrian Kubala wrote:
> > > Common Lisp would be ok too -- I prefer Scheme because it seems to have
> > > less awkward historical baggage and I like a functional (lots of HOFs)
> > > style -- but any (statically scoped) Lisp is better than PHP.

> > ... and how do you plan to do structs, objects and packages in Scheme?

> I cannot speak for the original poster, but the usual ways are
> with SRFI-9, the TinyCLOS or Meroon libraries, and S2 or similar.

Yes. I don't want to start another Scheme vs Lisp thread -- I should
probably have refrained from that "awkward historical baggage". While R5RS
might not offer everything I would want, I believe several Scheme
implementations (PLT in particular) do. I am also quite excited about the
possibilities of continuation-based sessions.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google