Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Donald Fisk <hibou00000nos...@enterprise.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:44:53 +0100
Local: Mon, Aug 26 2002 8:44 pm
Subject: Re: Why learn Lisp
Erik Naggum wrote: Agreed. Common Lisp is the best language we have. > So far, the willingness to listen does not even extend to Paul Graham's Arc. > Novices with a desire to reinvent the world before they know what it is like > should take notice of this. Improving on Common Lisp is /very/ hard. And > most of the "improvements" on Scheme are neither improvements nor Scheme. It even bothers me that people are busy inventing new languages This is not to say that people shouldn't try, but that they should And language designers should be able to program in numerous This doesn't prevent people inventing languages which aren't > Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Le Hibou -- Dalinian: Lisp. Java. Which one sounds sexier? RevAaron: Definitely Lisp. Lisp conjures up images of hippy coders, drugs, sex, and rock & roll. Late nights at Berkeley, coding in Lisp fueled by LSD. Java evokes a vision of a stereotypical nerd, with no life or social skills. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||