Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Why learn Lisp
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Donald Fisk  
View profile  
 More options Aug 27 2002, 12:33 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Donald Fisk <hibou00000nos...@enterprise.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 01:44:53 +0100
Local: Mon, Aug 26 2002 8:44 pm
Subject: Re: Why learn Lisp

Erik Naggum wrote:
>   So far, the willingness to listen does not even extend to Paul Graham's Arc.
>   Novices with a desire to reinvent the world before they know what it is like
>   should take notice of this.  Improving on Common Lisp is /very/ hard.  And
>   most of the "improvements" on Scheme are neither improvements nor Scheme.

Agreed.   Common Lisp is the best language we have.

It even bothers me that people are busy inventing new languages
which are clearly inferior to existing ones in all important
aspects.

This is not to say that people shouldn't try, but that they should
bear in mind that if they cannot claim their language is better
than Common Lisp (or at least a useful subset of it) in at least
one important way, maybe they should keep it to themselves.   It
isn't needed, and there are too many languages already.

And language designers should be able to program in numerous
quite different languages, and should maybe cut their teeth by
designing  a few special purpose languages, as I have done.

This doesn't prevent people inventing languages which aren't
as good as Lisp -- False was worth inventing, to show what could
still be done even if you limit your compiler size to one
kilobyte, for example.

> Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway

Le Hibou
--
Dalinian: Lisp. Java. Which one sounds sexier?
RevAaron: Definitely Lisp. Lisp conjures up images of hippy coders,
drugs,
sex, and rock & roll. Late nights at Berkeley, coding in Lisp fueled by
LSD.
Java evokes a vision of a stereotypical nerd, with no life or social
skills.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.