Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion arc tangent
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
tim Josling  
View profile
 More options Jan 20, 1:18 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: tim Josling <tejgcc_nos...@westnet.com.au>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:18:22 -0000
Local: Sun, Jan 20 2008 1:18 am
Subject: Re: arc tangent

On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:00:21 -0800, funkyj wrote:
> On Jan 19, 4:09 pm, tim Josling <tejgcc_nos...@westnet.com.au> wrote:

>> The parenthesis notation was supposed to be a temporary solution for
>> lisp until a more algebraic notation that was good enough could be found.

>> Some attempts at this include

>> - Dylan*
>> - Arc(*?)
>> - Haskell**
>> - Within lisp

> I like parenthesis.  What is wrong with them?

Nothing is wrong with them, in most cases.

Sometimes they are over the top. FORMAT is an example where using
parentheses would be over the top, also loop is better than lots of
parentheses. Maybe also arithmetic expressions - look at all the infix
projects.

I recently wrote a lexical analyser. I used nested expressions for
defining the regular expressions and it was kind of klunky. So maybe
regexes are another example where parentheses are too cumbersome.

Tim Josling


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google