> > vanekl wrote:
> >> Spiros Bousbouras wrote:

> >>> If it's true that as we progress in time, successive
> >>> fashionable languages resemble Lisp more and
> >>> more then Lisp's turn should come at some point.

> >>> Do you agree with this argument ? If yes, would
> >>> you say we're close to a Lisp boom ?

> >> IMO, not until CL goes through another standardization process,
> >> not for the language this time, but for a few libraries:
> >> comm, stream, unicode, thread.

> > Yeah, the damn thing is unusable as it is.

> unusable? needlessly inconvenient would be a better choice of words,
> methinks. Python has its advantages; ignoring them is... never mind.

> >> Too bad there isn't a benevolent angel that could fund such
> >> an expenditure <hint>PG</hint>.

> > Nah, he went broke trying to do a start-up with CL, a Web store I think.

> Time to put the cork back in the bottle. The bar is closed. Make sure
> you tip your waitress on the way out. Thank you and drive safely.

> > kt