Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Question about scoping
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ray Dillinger  
View profile  
 More options Sep 22 2003, 4:55 pm
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Ray Dillinger <b...@sonic.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:51:56 GMT
Local: Mon, Sep 22 2003 4:51 pm
Subject: Re: Question about scoping

jblazi wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:20:48 +0200, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> > The following paper is an overview with examples and references to other
> > papers: http://progwww.vub.ac.be/~wdmeuter/PostJava/Costanza.pdf
> Ok, thx to all of you.
> But is it not true that the master looked down upon Scheme as it was a
> statically scoped language? Or did I misunderstand Him? (And this was why
> He said that Scheme was in reality more related to Algol than to CL?)

One difference between scheme and algol is that Scheme gives you
everything
you need to implement dynamic scope if you want it, and Algol doesn't.
One
of the reasons why teachers like Scheme so much is that, by implementing
dynamic scope, they can show students the difference between dynamic and
lexical scope. When you just demonstrate the difference in a language
where
it's pre-built, some students won't "get it" because they don't see how
it
works.

                                Bear


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.