Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Reviews for lisp implementations
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Vassil Nikolov  
View profile  
 More options Apr 15 1999, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Vassil Nikolov <vniko...@poboxes.com>
Date: 1999/04/15
Subject: Re: Reviews for lisp implementations

Off-topic.

In article <37164EF3.F1598...@simplex.nl>,
  Arthur Lemmens <lemm...@simplex.nl> wrote:

(...)

> I'm so glad that I only need to type
>   (code-char #x41A)
> to actually get a Russian K

Cyrillic K, please.  There are a number of nations besides the
Russians, including Byelorussians, Macedonians, Serbs, Ukrainians,
as well as Bulgarians, who use (different versions of) this alphabet.

I am too lazy to look it up, but I believe the ISO 10646 name of
this character is CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER KA or something.

Historical Note:
The original version of the Cyrillic alphabet was developed in the
9th century on the basis of the Greek alphabet.  Its name is a
tribute to St. Cyril, the Eastern Roman scholar and missionary who
captured the phonetics of the (then common) Slavonic language
into a writing system (using a different alphabet, now extinct)
and who was a translator of the Bible, and its development is
credited to St. Climent of Okhrid, one of St. Cyril's disciples.

By the way, I am not aware of another alphabet besides the
contemporary Russian version of Cyrillics where the number
of letters is a power of 2 (2^5).

(...)

> But it  _does_ know something about Latin 1:

> CL-USER 17 > (code-char #xF0)
> #\ð

> CL-USER 18 > (char-upcase *)
> #\Ð

(...)

I'd rather have had the above as

  (char-code (char-upcase (code-char #xF0)))

instead of, or in addition to, the above, which makes little
apparent sense on my Macintosh with a Cyrillic font selected.

--
Vassil Nikolov <vnikoÄ

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.