Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion tagged CPU (was: LispOS, LispVM projects?)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jeffrey Mark Siskind  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Jeffrey Mark Siskind <q...@research.nj.nec.com>
Date: 1998/11/16
Subject: Re: tagged CPU (was: LispOS, LispVM projects?)
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

> The point I was trying to make in my paper was that using Lisp with
> declarations you can get FP performance similar to C, Java etc. however,
> without declartions it is only about as fast as 10 year old Symbolics
> technology (a 133MHZ Pentium is probably about 100x a Symbolics 3600:
> about 25x in click time and about 4x in architectural improvements).

Well, if you use the Stalin compiler for Scheme you can get FP performance
comparable to (and sometimes much better than) C *without* declarations.

    Jeff (http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/qobi)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google