Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: vanekl <lou.va...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: PCL trash
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 03:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <759e1c80-6458-4c01-9b6c-32ff98ebb187@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: comp.lang.lisp@googlegroups.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.102.102.26
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299239022 23948 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2011 11:43:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <f0cd32a3-e7a9-45cd-acd8-da282045ceb6@o15g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=99.102.102.26;
 posting-account=hNuVOgoAAAA6k8SYZzsAd-4078o3nzxz
User-Agent: G2/1.0

On Friday, March 4, 2011 6:35:43 AM UTC-5, Rainer Joswig wrote:
> On 4 Mrz., 12:18, vanekl <lou....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Yes, LOOP per se is unique to CL. Looping, on the other hand is not.
> 
> Not really.
> 
> There have been reimplementations/redesigns of LOOP for Scheme:
> 
> 
> The Anatomy of a Loop,  A story of scope and control, Olin Shivers
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=824ABD01D5AFB18C1FCB20465967C86F?doi=10.1.1.128.5560&rep=rep1&type=pdf
> 
> Loopy-loop
> http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/loopy-loop
> 
> Yow! LOOP macros are LOOPY!
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/msg/60dcac5ea812398
> 
> Common Lisp itself has a redesign of LOOP:
> http://common-lisp.net/project/iterate/doc/Don_0027t-Loop-Iterate.html

I'm referring to the official version of Scheme the language. Sorry if that was not clear.