>>>bradb wrote:

>>>>At least if nothing else good comes of all this, the cells-basic
>>>>tutorial is now up to date :)  <ducks>

>>><heh-heh> No need to duck, I was laughing about that already. The
>>>only downside is if I decide screw you guys, I'm going home.

>>>The larger point is that it really is a two-way street. You raised
>>>an issue with the doc and it got fixed. Coincidence? I don't think
>>>so. :)

>>>Doc whiners who never ask the maintainers anything remind me of this
>>>story:
>> Hey, I didn't whine about the doc; I don't care one way or the
>> other.
>> I just explaind why it was thta I never bothered to look deeply into
>> Cells, in response to your claim that it was because I was unable to
>> get it running.

> Stop bobbing and weaving. :) Your response was as you say, explaining
> that you could not find anything explaining what it was and why you
> should bother. That explanation is what I am addressing. And I cannot
> believe you did not explain how what I posted did not address both
> what Cells is and why you should bother.