Received: by 10.66.86.39 with SMTP id m7mr3483296paz.4.1350352698621; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Path: s9ni11342pbb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Pascal Costanza Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Google Common Lisp Style Guide Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:31:15 +0200 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net Rp5HbiBjQVoyF9dVTdfHCw49XtbV9bW1OpIWXzJ0LZWp/OIYjHyNCC8gQ78tRz0ZEO Cancel-Lock: sha1:URx5d4hwW0W9zOdDNhBFXtwUJuY= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/10/2012 08:58, Nils M Holm wrote: > Pascal Costanza wrote: >> Is there empirical evidence (not anecdotal evidence, mind you!) that >> these rules buy us anything? > > If people enjoy them, it "buys" them joy. > > What empirical evidence is there that using Lisp buys us anything? None. That's why there is also no document that says that you "must" use Lisp. Pascal -- My website: http://p-cos.net Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ The views expressed are my own, and not those of my employer.