Received: by 10.66.86.39 with SMTP id m7mr3483296paz.4.1350352698621;
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: s9ni11342pbb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Costanza
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Google Common Lisp Style Guide
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:31:15 +0200
Lines: 20
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net Rp5HbiBjQVoyF9dVTdfHCw49XtbV9bW1OpIWXzJ0LZWp/OIYjHyNCC8gQ78tRz0ZEO
Cancel-Lock: sha1:URx5d4hwW0W9zOdDNhBFXtwUJuY=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
In-Reply-To:
Bytes: 1702
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 12/10/2012 08:58, Nils M Holm wrote:
> Pascal Costanza wrote:
>> Is there empirical evidence (not anecdotal evidence, mind you!) that
>> these rules buy us anything?
>
> If people enjoy them, it "buys" them joy.
>
> What empirical evidence is there that using Lisp buys us anything?
None. That's why there is also no document that says that you "must" use
Lisp.
Pascal
--
My website: http://p-cos.net
Common Lisp Document Repository: http://cdr.eurolisp.org
Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/
The views expressed are my own, and not those of my employer.