Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David Hanley  
View profile  
 More options Mar 28 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: David Hanley <d...@ncgr.org>
Date: 2000/03/28
Subject: Re: Dangling Closing Parentheses vs. Stacked Closing Parentheses

"Pierre R. Mai" wrote:
> "Anthony Cartmell" <AJCartm...@csi.com> writes:

> > Sorry for the "newbie" question, but I thought that the indentation was
> > based on the list structure, and not the other way round.  If the parens
> > were based on the indentation then we wouldn't even need to use them.  My

> This is somewhat analogous to putting punctuation marks on their own
> lines in english language:  Since the grammatical structure of a
> sentence will already point out fairly well, where each sentence or
> phrase ends, there isn't much point in exagerating the importance of
> punctuation marks beyond all reasonable proportions.  Punctuation is
> important, since it disambiguates and modifies sentence meanings and
> length in a number of cases.  But it isn't the sole or even most
> important means of recognizing sentence length, structure and
> meaning.  So Don't elide punctuation, but don't exagerate it's
> importance either.

I don't think this is a valid argument Humans grow up using language
from birth and have it running through their heads every second of
their lives Also computer code requires much more accuracy while
spoken words an often be muddled through and imprecise which you
know especially well if you are married

The above is parodic in nature.  You can still make out quite well
what it means with no punctuation, partially because of the many
levels of redundancy in spoken language.  While lisp code:

defmethod play-move ttt tic-tac-toe move
  let board board ttt setf square board move  if = to-move ttt 1 'x 'o won? ttt
move switch-players ttt

Is unacceptable.  You don't know if it's a specialized function or not, and if
so, on what,
you don't know what the parameters of the function are, etc.

Yes, editors can help you naviagte through code.  But it is nuch more work to
navigate through code then format it so the eye can see it naturally, especially

when code is complex and under heavy development.

dave


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.