Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion bignums in clisp
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Paul Wallich  
View profile  
 More options Oct 2 2012, 11:17 am
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Paul Wallich <p...@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 11:17:53 -0400
Local: Tues, Oct 2 2012 11:17 am
Subject: Re: bignums in clisp
On 10/2/12 10:54 AM, Ian Clifton wrote:

> Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu> writes:

>> In article <20120928140653....@kylheku.com>,
>>   Kaz Kylheku <k...@kylheku.com> wrote:

>>> They are not "bigger", just more, err, "magnitudinous"!

>>> Bigger means, strictly, occupying more RAM. :)

>> It obviously depends on the context. I'm pretty sure he meant it in the
>> normal, mathematical sense, in which 10 is bigger than 9.

> I suppose it would be possible—not perhaps sensible, but possible—to
> have a Lisp implementation whose bignum type had a length which could
> expand as necessary beyond integer to itself become a bignum of the same
> kind. Such a Lisp could represent any integer, I guess.

Aren't you going to run out of memory long before then? Perhaps there
should be bignums with some kind of sparse-byte or runlength encoding.

paul


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.