Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: david.gol...@oceanfree.net (David Golden)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: We need a flamewar: SBCL vs CMUCL? [was: Re: What's happening in  the Lisp world today?]
Date: 12 Sep 2003 11:08:18 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <235b265c.0309121008.67164f9b@posting.google.com>
References: <df045d93.0308261224.7770a33c@posting.google.com> <87ptisi2fn.fsf@bird.agharta.de> <df045d93.0308270121.732d48da@posting.google.com> <3F5A556E.A3187911@enterprise.net> <3F5A5962.7050706@nyc.rr.com> <9apulv09cj7far1b3qjg863eksdjri0dso@4ax.com> <87k78fl4s4.fsf@noetbook.telent.net> <3F60AB6A.3010407@nyc.rr.com> <sy6lb2jeox51.dlg@parsec.no-spoon.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.202.161.228
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1063390099 24188 127.0.0.1 (12 Sep 2003 18:08:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Sep 2003 18:08:19 GMT

Stefan Scholl <ste...@no-spoon.de> wrote in message news:<sy6lb2jeox51.dlg@parsec.no-spoon.de>...
> Funny thing is: you can edit CMUCL and SBCL with Emacs _and_ with
> XEmacs! :-)


Well, CMUCL-18e with XEmacs/ilisp seems to have problems for some
people.  (see ilisp mailing list...).  I don't know myself, I use
plain gnu emacs+ilisp with CMUCL 18e with no problem.